1992
DOI: 10.1142/s021797929200102x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Classification of Fusion Rule Algebras in Rational Conformal Field Theories

Abstract: We review the main topics concerning Fusion Rule Algebras (FRA) of Rational Conformal Field Theories. After an exposition of their general properties, we examine known results on the complete classification for low number of fields (≤ 4). We then turn our attention to FRA's generated polynomially by one (real) fundamental field, for which a classification is known. Attempting to generalize this result, we describe some connections between FRA's and Graph Theory. The possibility to get new results on the subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The category of representations of W(p) in the (1, p) model decomposes into linkage classes of representations, which are full subcategories of the representation category. 3 The representation category of the algebra W(p) associated with the (1, p) model has p + 1 linkage classes; we denote them as LC, LC ′ , and LC(s) with 1 ≤ s ≤ p−1. The indecomposable representations in each linkage class are as follows.…”
Section: Extensions Among the Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The category of representations of W(p) in the (1, p) model decomposes into linkage classes of representations, which are full subcategories of the representation category. 3 The representation category of the algebra W(p) associated with the (1, p) model has p + 1 linkage classes; we denote them as LC, LC ′ , and LC(s) with 1 ≤ s ≤ p−1. The indecomposable representations in each linkage class are as follows.…”
Section: Extensions Among the Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indecomposable representations in each linkage class are as follows. The classes LC and LC ′ contain only a single indecomposable (hence, irreducible) 3 The term "linkage class" is borrowed from the theory of finite-dimensional Lie algebras. The linkage classes of an additive category C are additive full subcategories C i such that there are no (nonzero) morphisms between objects in two distinct linkage classes, every object of C is a direct sum of objects of the linkage classes, and none of the C i can be split further in the same manner.…”
Section: Extensions Among the Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general study of these fusion algebras [3] and their classification have been the object of much work [4]. In particular, the possibility that they may be represented by sets of polynomials has been considered [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 , the Chebychev polynomials of the second kind (defined by p 0 = 1, p 1 (x) = x, p n+2 (x) = xp n+1 (x) − p n (x)) evaluated at the adjacency matrix T p ′ −1 2 of the tadpole graph A p ′ −1 /Z Z 2 [30]. Moreover these polynomials are generators of the fusion ring of the (2, p ′ )-Virasoro minimal model.…”
Section: Factorization Of W W-fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%