2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70594-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Class-Aware Information Granulation for Graph Embedding and Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Granular Computing Approach for Labelled Graphs (GRALG) is a classification system suitable for dealing with (fully) labelled graphs grounded on the Granular Computing paradigm [30,31]. GRALG was originally proposed in [32] and later improved in [33][34][35][36][37][38], addressing some computational drawbacks in the original implementation. As anticipated, GRALG follows the Granular Computing paradigm, hence it aims at automatically extracting pivotal mathematical entities known in the technical literature as information granules, able to characterize the data at hand as much as possible.…”
Section: The Gralg Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Granular Computing Approach for Labelled Graphs (GRALG) is a classification system suitable for dealing with (fully) labelled graphs grounded on the Granular Computing paradigm [30,31]. GRALG was originally proposed in [32] and later improved in [33][34][35][36][37][38], addressing some computational drawbacks in the original implementation. As anticipated, GRALG follows the Granular Computing paradigm, hence it aims at automatically extracting pivotal mathematical entities known in the technical literature as information granules, able to characterize the data at hand as much as possible.…”
Section: The Gralg Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g i ∈ K is the ith pattern of cluster K and g is the representative element of the cluster. Since the Granulator deals with non-geometric entities (i.e., graphs), we consider the medoid of the cluster as its representative [41]. Finally, the cardinality of the cluster is defined as the relative size of the cluster K with respect to the overall number of candidate information granules:…”
Section: Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentages are chosen according to the following rule: the larger the dataset, the higher the subsampling rate. For the sake of shorthand, we omit any sensitivity analysis on the behavior of the Granulators as a function of W. In this regard, we refer the interested reader to our previous works [41,46,66] The values for W for both clique-based and path-based Granulators are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Algorithmic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%