2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.09.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a chromatographic similarity index to establish localized quantitative structure-retention models for retention prediction: Use of retention factor ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such models regularly require several initial experimental runs, which make this approach time-consuming. Recently some quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) based approaches were also reported for HILIC method development and retention prediction [3,[17][18][19]. In these studies, retention modeling was restricted to small molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models regularly require several initial experimental runs, which make this approach time-consuming. Recently some quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) based approaches were also reported for HILIC method development and retention prediction [3,[17][18][19]. In these studies, retention modeling was restricted to small molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study showed that building models based on clustering the compounds and their similarity (retention factors) appeared to be an effective approach in minimizing the prediction errors in HILIC. 194 The concept of chromatographic similarity in QSRR could be implemented by localized modeling using a measure of similarity that adequately reflects solute retention. A recent review summarized the possibilities of chemometric-assisted method development in HILIC.…”
Section: Automated Tools For Methods Development In Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,25,26] We have also constructed highly accurate local retention models based on chromatographic similarity searching found by comparing retention factors of database compounds with that of the test analyte. [27] Very recently, we have combined structural similarity and chromatographic similarity in an efficient dual filtering approach consisting of three main steps. [28] First, structural similarity was used as a primary filter to identify a subset of database compounds having structural similarity values above a chosen threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%