The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1177/1039856216649775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a better understanding of standard determination and standard setting in the RANZCP summative assessments

Abstract: There is no evidence of any single standard setting method to be the best. Multiple methods exist and will have varied results when applied. The judgement of a panel of subject experts remains an important component of the standard setting process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of this program has led to a number of articles written in College journals. [2][3][4][5][6][7] These articles have academically analysed the program, but, until now, nothing has been published on the lived experiences of the trainees who have been through it. As two registrars from the class of 2013 who have completed the external examination components, we have often been asked about our experiences of the program.…”
Section: Two Million Six Hundred and Twenty Eight Thousand Minutes: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of this program has led to a number of articles written in College journals. [2][3][4][5][6][7] These articles have academically analysed the program, but, until now, nothing has been published on the lived experiences of the trainees who have been through it. As two registrars from the class of 2013 who have completed the external examination components, we have often been asked about our experiences of the program.…”
Section: Two Million Six Hundred and Twenty Eight Thousand Minutes: mentioning
confidence: 99%