2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2035918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Voltage-Quality Regulation in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, no economic regulation of the voltage dips is still active [31]. However, some preliminary studies [32,33] offer valuable figures resulting from measurements, survey and simulations, which can guide in deriving the economic value to assign to the voltage dips.…”
Section: Cost Of Voltage Dipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, no economic regulation of the voltage dips is still active [31]. However, some preliminary studies [32,33] offer valuable figures resulting from measurements, survey and simulations, which can guide in deriving the economic value to assign to the voltage dips.…”
Section: Cost Of Voltage Dipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we referred to [32] where the authors analyzed the economic and technical data collected for a number of medium-voltage (MV) industrial users that participated in the cost assessment project and the monitoring campaign. In particular, the authors used an indirect method based on a monitoring-and-survey approach to estimate the direct costs faced by a large variety of industrial customers.…”
Section: Cost Of Voltage Dipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the distribution networks in Italy, immunity curves defined by Class 2 and Class 3 testing levels in IEC 61000‐4‐11/34 are used as reference curves by the Italian regulator to distinguish between “minor dips” and “major dips” where the latter are often the most problematic for the customers. From measurement campaigns, the EN50160 standard table is used to classify dips when estimating the numbers of voltage dips, process immunity, and related costs for customers.…”
Section: Responsibility‐sharing Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit on the number of voltage dips per year for the MV customers is set based on the local circumstances, whereas for HV customers the objective is based on historical performance of the networks. 22,23 For the distribution networks in Italy, 16,17 immunity curves defined by Class 2 and Class 3 testing levels in IEC 61000-4-11/34 11,12 are used as reference curves by the Italian regulator to distinguish between "minor dips" and "major dips" where the latter are often the most problematic for the customers. From measurement campaigns, the EN50160 standard table is used to classify dips when estimating the numbers of voltage dips, process immunity, and related costs for customers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, one could object that, probably, most real industrial processes have an overall immunity better than the Class 2 (and even the Class 3) curve. To this regard, it is interesting to note the results of a monitoring period over 3 months that involved an ensemble of 16 MV industrial users [14], according to which: -all of the 35 transient interruptions recorded caused a PPH -41 out of 45 (91%) voltage dips below the Class 2 curve caused a PPH -44 out of 278 (16%) voltage dips over the Class 2 curve caused a PPH.…”
Section: Pq Statistical Data and Pph Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%