2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1916365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Understanding the Changing Politics of U.S. Cities: A Political Development Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These case studies suggest that youth can play an important role not just in education organizing (which has been garnering increasing attention), but in neighborhood revitalization as well (Checkoway, 2011; Shirley, 2009; Stone & Whelan, 2011). In some ways, the interviewees’ testimonies better define the relationship between critical pedagogy and community development by articulating what it is not rather than what it is.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These case studies suggest that youth can play an important role not just in education organizing (which has been garnering increasing attention), but in neighborhood revitalization as well (Checkoway, 2011; Shirley, 2009; Stone & Whelan, 2011). In some ways, the interviewees’ testimonies better define the relationship between critical pedagogy and community development by articulating what it is not rather than what it is.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admirably, no one seems to be wrestling with this problem more forcefully than Stone himself. Instead of digging in his heels and defending regime analysis in its current form, Stone has spent the past several years frankly acknowledging regime theory’s current shortcomings and presenting ideas for moving forward, most recently in this issue (see also Stone 2012, 2013; Stone and Whelen 2009, 2011). Stone’s present argument calls for a broadening of regime analysis that would retain some of regime theory’s core propositions—including the need for public–private cooperation as a means of generating resources needed for governance—but also pay greater attention to the issue of change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%