In the past 20 years, there have been numerous calls for a reinvigoration of vocational psychology. Now, as vocational psychology has grown again within counseling psychology, the authors argue that what is needed is not a reinvigoration but rather a new paradigm that reintegrates vocational psychology and the rest of counseling psychology. The new paradigm conceptualizes vocational issues as an integral part of theory, research, practice, and teaching of counseling psychology. Vocational issues should not overshadow other issues but should be an integrated part of what counseling psychologists do. The articles in this major contribution take steps toward this new paradigm by addressing teaching issues in counseling psychology training programs. If the new paradigm is to be adopted by all counseling psychologists, they must begin in their training programs. These articles give suggestions for how to begin the paradigm shift in this setting, discussing implications for the science and practice of counseling psychology beyond the training programs.In this Major Contribution, we argue for a change in the paradigm for the role of vocational psychology within counseling psychology. Kuhn (1970) defined a paradigm and a paradigm shift, in particular, as having three distinguishing characteristics: (a) it necessitates rejection of an incompatible way of thinking, (b) it opens up new possibilities for scientific inquiry, and (c) it changes the way scientists view the world around them. He went on to say that paradigm shifts can exist within scientific subspecialties; that is, they do not have to be global. We are proposing this type of paradigm shift within the subspecialty of counseling psychology.The paradigm that we propose is to reintegrate vocational psychology with all aspects of counseling psychology. Specifically, we propose that vocational issues be viewed as primary issues and contextual factors in people's lives. In the new paradigm, vocational factors will provide another facet