2015
DOI: 10.31826/jlr-2015-131-206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Algonquian-Wakashan. Part 1: Proof of the Algonquian-Wakashan relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first language pair is Chukotko-Kamchatkan–Nivkh ( p < 0.003, corrected for multiple testing). To the best of our knowledge, a specific genealogical relationship between the Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh languages was first proposed by Fortescue (23), although it must be noted that earlier Mudrak and Nikolaev (24), relying on the controversial multilateral or “mass” comparison approach introduced by Greenberg, had suggested that Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh along with a number of languages of North America may constitute a hypothetical Almosan-Keresiouan macrofamily; later Nikolaev (25) claimed that lexical parallels between Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh are of contact origin, but did not provide reliable arguments for this contact scenario. It is notable that in his research, Fortescue relied purely on the comparative method traditionally accepted by historical linguists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first language pair is Chukotko-Kamchatkan–Nivkh ( p < 0.003, corrected for multiple testing). To the best of our knowledge, a specific genealogical relationship between the Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh languages was first proposed by Fortescue (23), although it must be noted that earlier Mudrak and Nikolaev (24), relying on the controversial multilateral or “mass” comparison approach introduced by Greenberg, had suggested that Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh along with a number of languages of North America may constitute a hypothetical Almosan-Keresiouan macrofamily; later Nikolaev (25) claimed that lexical parallels between Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh are of contact origin, but did not provide reliable arguments for this contact scenario. It is notable that in his research, Fortescue relied purely on the comparative method traditionally accepted by historical linguists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%