2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa88aa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Space-like Photometric Precision from the Ground with Beam-shaping Diffusers

Abstract: We demonstrate a path to hitherto unachievable differential photometric precisions from the ground, both in the optical and near-infrared (NIR), using custom-fabricated beam-shaping diffusers produced using specialized nanofabrication techniques. Such diffusers mold the focal plane image of a star into a broad and stable top-hat shape, minimizing photometric errors due to non-uniform pixel response, atmospheric seeing effects, imperfect guiding, and telescope-induced variable aberrations seen in defocusing. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
134
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(160 reference statements)
4
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that the RMS values largely follow the expected white-noise behavior, although we note that slight excursions below the Gaussian expected values are observed at the largest bin sizes, which still are largely consistent with the Gaussian expected precision within the reported error bars. Similar and larger departures below the Gaussian expected precision have been reported by a number of groups in the literature (e.g., Blecic et al 2013;Stefansson et al 2017), and Cubillos et al (2017) show that these excursions are not statistically significant after taking into account the increasingly skewed inverse gamma distribution of the RMS values at the largest bin sizes. Following our previous work (Stefansson et al 2017(Stefansson et al , 2018a, we argue that excursions much below the Gaussian expected precision is likely an overestimate of the actual precision achieved, and we conservatively say that we achieve 138ppm precision in 30 minute bins for these transit observations.…”
Section: Ground-based Light Curve Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observe that the RMS values largely follow the expected white-noise behavior, although we note that slight excursions below the Gaussian expected values are observed at the largest bin sizes, which still are largely consistent with the Gaussian expected precision within the reported error bars. Similar and larger departures below the Gaussian expected precision have been reported by a number of groups in the literature (e.g., Blecic et al 2013;Stefansson et al 2017), and Cubillos et al (2017) show that these excursions are not statistically significant after taking into account the increasingly skewed inverse gamma distribution of the RMS values at the largest bin sizes. Following our previous work (Stefansson et al 2017(Stefansson et al , 2018a, we argue that excursions much below the Gaussian expected precision is likely an overestimate of the actual precision achieved, and we conservatively say that we achieve 138ppm precision in 30 minute bins for these transit observations.…”
Section: Ground-based Light Curve Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The target rose from airmass 1.55 to airmass 1.05 during the observations. We observed the transit using the Engineered Diffuser on the ARCTIC imager, which has been described in detail in Stefansson et al (2017Stefansson et al ( , 2018a. In short, the Engineered Diffuser molds the focal-plane image of the star into a broad and stable top-hat shape, allowing us to increase our exposure times to gather more photons per exposure while minimizing correlated errors due to point spread function (PSF) variations and guiding errors.…”
Section: Diffuser-assisted Photometry From the Arc 35mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An occultation of WASP-12b was also observed with the Wide-Field Infrared Camera (WIRC, Wilson et al 2003) on the Hale 200-inch telescope at Palomar Observatory on 18 March 2017. This observation was made in the K s band using a new Hawaii-II detector installed on WIRC in January 2017 (Tinyanont et al 2019) and a near-infrared Engineered Diffuser (Stefansson et al 2017). We obtained 1,828 images with an exposure time of 2 seconds, spanning 5 hours.…”
Section: Wirc Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%