2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft.2019.8722822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Shape Optimization of Soft Robots

Abstract: In this paper we present our work on shape optimization for soft robotics where the shape is optimized for a given soft robot usage. To obtain a parametric optimization with a reduced number of parameters, we rely on an approach where the designer progressively refines the parameter space and the fitness function until a satisfactory design is obtained. In our approach, we automatically generate FEM simulations of the soft robot and its environment to evaluate a fitness function while checking the consistency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this choice are its good convergence properties and its capacity to avoid local minima. The same algorithm was previously chosen for the design of robotic feet [23] and other integrated design problems [10].…”
Section: A Case Study Description A) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this choice are its good convergence properties and its capacity to avoid local minima. The same algorithm was previously chosen for the design of robotic feet [23] and other integrated design problems [10].…”
Section: A Case Study Description A) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for very complex problems, the differentiability property may be near-impossible to achieve, and one has to resort to derivative-free optimization. While evolutionary algorithms and their siblings require more iterations, they can help to navigate complex design spaces [41] with many local minima and discontinuities [42,43].…”
Section: Alternative Optimization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work by Skouras et al [49] optimized the shape of balloons such that a desired shape was obtained under inflation-there are clear parallels to soft robotic applications. More recent work has looked at the shape optimization of tendon-driven soft robots [38,41] and also the shape optimization of pneumatic actuators [32,35,36,50].…”
Section: Actuation and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCC models on the other hand are reported by Renda et al (2018) to be inaccurate when the soft device they model is subjected to non-negligible external loads as is typical for FRE fingers. Finite element (FE) models constitute a third popular method in soft robotics and have been shown to be able to produce accurate results for predicting the deformation of grasping soft fingers by Coevoet et al (2019) and conduct shape optimization in Morzadec et al (2019), but as in any model based on FE methods the number of DOFs remains large. Workarounds to deal with this issue have been proposed in the literature such as a procedure where the designer progressively refines the parameter space in Morzadec et al (2019) or algorithmically, as in Goury and Duriez (2018), to reduce the complexity of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) models constitute a third popular method in soft robotics and have been shown to be able to produce accurate results for predicting the deformation of grasping soft fingers by Coevoet et al (2019) and conduct shape optimization in Morzadec et al (2019), but as in any model based on FE methods the number of DOFs remains large. Workarounds to deal with this issue have been proposed in the literature such as a procedure where the designer progressively refines the parameter space in Morzadec et al (2019) or algorithmically, as in Goury and Duriez (2018), to reduce the complexity of the model. Finally, our model will also be shown to be able to predict with a fair degree of accuracy both the contact forces along the finger and the overall grasp strength, which none of the previous models dealt with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%