2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12667-015-0148-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment

Abstract: In this second portion of a two-part analysis of a scalable computational approach to stochastic unit commitment (SUC), we focus on solving stochastic mixedinteger programs in tractable run-times. Our solution technique is based on Rockafellar and Wets' progressive hedging algorithm, a scenario-based decomposition strategy for B Jean-Paul Watson 123 K. Cheung et al.solving stochastic programs. To achieve high-quality solutions in tractable run-times, we describe critical, novel customizations of the progressiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we do not examine multi-stage stochastic unit commitment models in the companion paper [4], we note that our scenarios are tree-structured and consequently can be effectively used in that context.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we do not examine multi-stage stochastic unit commitment models in the companion paper [4], we note that our scenarios are tree-structured and consequently can be effectively used in that context.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments proceed in the context of publicly available data from the Independent System Operator of New England (ISO-NE). The resulting scenarios are then used in the companion paper [4] to rigorously test the scalability of a stochastic unit commitment solver. These scenarios and the resulting test cases are publicly available, filling a critical need for researchers investigating the scalability of stochastic unit commitment solvers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenario decomposition approaches based on Rockafellar and Wets' progressive hedging algorithm have been proposed in [24], [25] to solve two-stage Stochastic Mixed-Integer Linear Problems (SMILP) with uncertainty at the operational level. In [25] the investment model is static and the decisions can only be made at the beginning of the period.…”
Section: A Decomposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive Hedging (PH) is another popular decomposition technique applied to SMILP problems; however, it does not guarantee convergence to an optimal solution while intermediate solutions may be infeasible. In addition, PH has been largely limited to two-stage cases [24], [25], [26]. Recently, a method to compute lower bounds in the Progressive Hedging Algorithm for multi-stage mixed integer programs has been proposed in [27].…”
Section: A Decomposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the introduction of variable energy resources (e.g., wind and solar) leads to circumstances in which predictions from deterministic models are subject to significant errors. In order to accommodate such challenges, there have been recommendations that UC models should be solved using either the stochastic or the robust UC formulations (see, e.g., [15] and [16], respectively). In either case, the speed with which large scale deterministic UC models can be solved becomes important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%