Toward privacy-sensitive human–robot interaction: Privacy terms and human–data interaction in the personal robot era

Abstract

Can we have personal robots without giving away personal data? Besides, what is the role of a robots Privacy Policy in that question? This work explores for the first time privacy in the context of consumer robotics through the lens of information communicated to users through Privacy Policies and Terms and Conditions. Privacy, personal and non-personal data are discussed under the light of the human–robot relationship, while we attempt to draw connections to dimensions related to personalization, trust, and transparency. We introduce a novel methodology to assess how the “Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Trans-Border Flows of Personal Data” are reflected upon the publicly available Privacy Policies and Terms and Conditions in the consumer robotics field. We draw comparisons between the ways eight consumer robotic companies approach privacy principles. Current findings demonstrate significant deviations in the structure and context of privacy terms. Some practical dimensions in terms of improving the context and the format of privacy terms are discussed. The ultimate goal of this work is to raise awareness regarding the various privacy strategies used by robot companies while ultimately creating a usable way to make this information more relevant and accessible to users.

Cybersecurity in Motion: A Survey of Challenges and Requirements for Future Test Facilities of CAVs

“…The challenge lies in ensuring that cybersecurity tools designed for or within CTEF, consider data privacy when applied to real-world scenarios. Authors in [110] 25 identify this as an issue in the EU Regulation on the Free Flow of Non-personal Data [111]. Data anonymity is a major issue that has to be investigated in the context of C-ITS.…”

A Call for Stronger Privacy Protections to Promote the Development of Ethical Domestic Robots

“…However, as stated by the ICO, data about a house will not, by itself, constitute personal data, unless that data can be linked to the relevant owner [9], which blurs the lines when considering domestic devices such as the previously discussed Roomba and Ring security camera as well as upcoming companion robots. It is also unclear whether inferences to individual users drawn from non-personal data are protected under the GDPR [10], further reflecting the lack of clarity in this area.…”