2005
DOI: 10.1021/ci050380d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Prediction of Class II Mouse Major Histocompatibility Complex Peptide Binding Affinity:  in Silico Bioinformatic Evaluation Using Partial Least Squares, a Robust Multivariate Statistical Technique

Abstract: The accurate identification of T-cell epitopes remains a principal goal of bioinformatics within immunology. As the immunogenicity of peptide epitopes is dependent on their binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, the prediction of binding affinity is a prerequisite to the reliable prediction of epitopes. The iterative self-consistent (ISC) partial-least-squares (PLS)-based additive method is a recently developed bioinformatic approach for predicting class II peptide-MHC binding affinity. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scores for all possible peptide binding registers were calculated and either the maximum value or sum were used as the final peptide binding score. Later methods employed various machine learning and data fitting approaches to prediction including partial least squares (PLS) [24,25], Gibbs sampling [26], linear programming [27], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [28-30], kernel methods [31], or a combination of data fitting techniques [32]. Recently, we introduced the R egularized T hermodynamic A verage, or RTA, prediction method [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores for all possible peptide binding registers were calculated and either the maximum value or sum were used as the final peptide binding score. Later methods employed various machine learning and data fitting approaches to prediction including partial least squares (PLS) [24,25], Gibbs sampling [26], linear programming [27], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [28-30], kernel methods [31], or a combination of data fitting techniques [32]. Recently, we introduced the R egularized T hermodynamic A verage, or RTA, prediction method [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores for all possible peptide binding registers were calculated and either the maximum value or sum were used as a total peptide binding score. Later methods employed various machine learning and data fitting approaches to prediction including partial least squares (PLS) [10,11], Gibbs sampling [12], linear programming [13], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [14-16], and kernel methods [17]. One prediction method, called SMM-align, successfully combined two methods, binding profile matrices and Gibbs sampling [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have been developed for peptide binding to class II MHC using a wide variety of fitting techniques including partial least squares (PLS) [18], [19], Gibbs sampling [20], linear programming [21], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [22], [23], [24], kernel methods [25], non-linear optimization with a regularization penalty [26], or a combination of data fitting techniques [27]. A few methods can even make predictions for closely related MHC types not used for training [28], [29], [30], basically by interpolating between prediction models for the few experimentally characterized MHC types based on limited structural information about shared MHC residues or pockets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%