2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward personalized dose-prescription in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Validation of published normal tissue complication probability models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also contrasts with dosimetric factors including eso mean, eso max, as well as eso V20, eso V35, eso V60 which have been analyzed retrospectively in [35], and using a mixture of retrospective and prospective collected datasets in [9]. It is important to note that we specifically examined grade 3 RE, whereas much of the prior literature has examined grade 2 esophagitis, a less clinically impactful toxicity [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also contrasts with dosimetric factors including eso mean, eso max, as well as eso V20, eso V35, eso V60 which have been analyzed retrospectively in [35], and using a mixture of retrospective and prospective collected datasets in [9]. It is important to note that we specifically examined grade 3 RE, whereas much of the prior literature has examined grade 2 esophagitis, a less clinically impactful toxicity [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further attribute the difference in results between our current models and the prior literature to a combination of the different toxicity endpoint assessed (grade 3 vs. grade 2), variance in radiation techniques, and implementation of resampling. Previously published reports using models developed using a median cohort size of 141 (well below our actual cohort), and median rate of radiation esophagitis of 11.1%, used logistic regression approaches [1,9,12,17,31,32,34,36,37,39], while some other studies would fit Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models, both using pre-IMRT era cohorts [14,33], which may not reflect the current risks of radiation-induced toxicity in a contemporary setting. A more recent study used lasso regularization using a smaller cohort of 94 patients, where 16% developed radiation esophagitis [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended to limit V20 to ≤30–35%, and MLD to ≤20–23 Gy in normofractionated radiotherapy to limit the risk of RIP to ≤20% in patients with NSCLC [ 124 ]. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with single doses of ≥2.5 Gy is associated with higher rates of RIP [ 124 , 136 ]. For SBRT, V20 > 10% and MLD > 6 Gy were associated with higher risk of grade 2–4 RIP [ 137 139 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimizing radiation-induced acute esophagitis (AE) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is critical given the high rate of AE due to the proximity between the esophagus and the large tumors [1]. The esophagus is a mobile structure and the planned esophagus dose may not accurately represent the actual accumulated esophagus dose due to anatomical changes and setup uncertainties arising from e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%