Toward Optimizing LNAPL Remediation

Abstract

Optimizing the remediation of light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) to achieve an acceptable endpoint status for a site is not trivial. Recently, Sookhak Lari, Johnston, et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.006), Sookhak Lari, Rayner, and Davis (2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.041) conducted three-dimensional multiphase, multicomponent simulations to address LNAPL remediation endpoints for a single recovery well. However, optimized LNAPL remediation for multiple wells is not addressed in the literature. In the first part of this paper, we establish a matrix of 10 simulation scenarios to show the sensitivity of the remedial endpoint (i.e., what is feasibly achieved) to several parameters including viscosity and partitioning attributes of the LNAPL, heterogeneity of the formation, and the location and number of the recovery wells. While this addresses the variability of LNAPL removal from the subsurface and is valuable in its own right, it does not address the optimal removal of LNAPL. We address this in the second part of the paper by linking a genetic algorithm to TMVOC-MP to allow, for example, the assessment of the optimal number and location of LNAPL recovery wells in a field-scale problem. Using supercomputing facilities and within 49 genetic algorithm generations, each including 150 members, highly optimized answers to different objective functions were obtained. For the first time, such a multiphase, multicomponent optimization tool promises the possibility of optimizing LNAPL remediation at field scale to achieve practicable endpoint conditions, within computational affordability.

Integrating Process‐Based Reactive Transport Modeling and Machine Learning for Electrokinetic Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater

“…An increasing use of surrogate models in the field of groundwater contamination and remediation would help lowering the technical barriers in the simulation and increase the trust in technologies that are currently considered very difficult to predict due to the complex interplay between several physical and biogeochemical processes. In fact, complexity is a key feature of subsurface systems where inherently coupled flow, mass transfer processes, chemical and biological reactions control the fate of contaminants (Battistel et al., 2021; Fakhreddine et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2020; Li, 2019; Prommer et al., 2019; Rathi et al., 2017; Steefel et al., 2015; Stolze et al., 2019a, 2019b) and the efficiency of in situ remediation technologies (Ni et al., 2015; Piscopo et al., 2013; Sookhak Lari et al., 2019; Sprocati et al., 2020).…”

Recent Strategies for Bioremediation of Emerging Pollutants: A Review for a Green and Sustainable Environment

“…It combines both the approaches of bioventing, which utilize aerobic bioremediation of contaminated soil in situ. Free product is recovered by a vacuum-enhanced system that utilizes LNAPLs from the capillary fringe [73]. Free product is "slurped" up the bioslurping tube into a trap or oil-water separator for further treatment after the bioslurping tube is vacuumed.…”

Multi-well capture zones in strip-shaped aquifers

“…The concept inspired by the process of natural selection consisted of selection, crossover, mutation, reproduction and replacement searches for a global optimal or a near-global optimal solution. For a comprehensive understanding of GA and its application in water resources management, readers are referred to [54][55][56][57][58][59]. The GA method follows these steps:…”