2020
DOI: 10.1002/acg2.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward “off‐the‐shelf” allogeneic CAR T cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two major categories of such allogeneic cell products are based on engineering healthy-donor-derived conventional ab T cells or NK cells. 14,68,69,77 Because conventional ab T cells risk inducing GvHD in allogeneic hosts due to HLA incompatibility, these T cells need to be gene edited to ablate endogenous TCR expression, usually by disrupting the TRAC or/and TRBC gene loci, to make them suitable for allogeneic cell therapy but meanwhile may also potentially increase manufacture complexity. [10][11][12][13] On the other hand, NK-based allogeneic cell products are considered of low GvHD risk and therefore do not require additional gene editing, but their in vivo clonal expansion and antitumor performance may be limited compared to that of conventional ab T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major categories of such allogeneic cell products are based on engineering healthy-donor-derived conventional ab T cells or NK cells. 14,68,69,77 Because conventional ab T cells risk inducing GvHD in allogeneic hosts due to HLA incompatibility, these T cells need to be gene edited to ablate endogenous TCR expression, usually by disrupting the TRAC or/and TRBC gene loci, to make them suitable for allogeneic cell therapy but meanwhile may also potentially increase manufacture complexity. [10][11][12][13] On the other hand, NK-based allogeneic cell products are considered of low GvHD risk and therefore do not require additional gene editing, but their in vivo clonal expansion and antitumor performance may be limited compared to that of conventional ab T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy donors can be selected based on T‐cell fitness and on successful and consistent manufacturability, ensuring that eligible R/R B‐cell NHL patients have immediate access to a high‐quality and uniform CAR T‐cell product. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 Challenges do exist with allogeneic CAR T‐cell products, namely graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) and immunogenicity (i.e. host‐versus‐graft rejection) of the allogeneic CAR T‐cell product, both of which are consequences of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility between donors and patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logistics involved in this traditional manufacturing and treatment with autologous CAR-T cells adds complexity for clinicians and patients because the period in between, referred to as “vein-to-vein time” , ranges between three and 4 weeks in developed countries. This period can be daunting for the patients awaiting treatment and renders the CAR-T treatment complicated for patients with rapidly progressing diseases ( Aftab et al, 2020 ). Nowadays, this therapy presents these main manufacturing challenges and the picture in developed and underdeveloped countries is very different.…”
Section: Immunotherapy a New Approach For Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAR-T cells manufacturing does not allow volumetric scale-up, consequently, cells must be prepared as a single batch limiting the quantity of available product. Under this scenario, patients may not have the opportunity to receive a new infusion of their CAR-T cells quickly and easily if needed ( Aftab et al, 2020 ; Papathanasiou et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Immunotherapy a New Approach For Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%