2023
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1080752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward objective monitoring of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms using a wearable device: wearability and performance evaluation of PDMonitor®

Abstract: Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms. As disease progresses, fluctuations in the response to levodopa treatment may develop, along with emergence of freezing of gait (FoG) and levodopa induced dyskinesia (LiD). The optimal management of the motor symptoms and their complications, depends, principally, on the consistent detection of their course, leading to improved treatment decisions. During the last few years, wearable devices have started to be used in the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several home monitoring systems are available for persons with PD. For example, the PDMonitor ® is a system intended to be used for continues home monitoring of motor related symptoms of PD 26 . PDMonitor demonstrated high correlation between the severity of the majority of the symptoms and the clinicians’ evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several home monitoring systems are available for persons with PD. For example, the PDMonitor ® is a system intended to be used for continues home monitoring of motor related symptoms of PD 26 . PDMonitor demonstrated high correlation between the severity of the majority of the symptoms and the clinicians’ evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of monitoring devices has finally led to systems that can record all the cardinal symptoms of PD along with motor complications, including measurements from four extremities and the trunk, and giving an integrated evaluation of patient's condition [9,[29][30][31][32]. Each monitoring system is validated against clinical examination, to confirm that it delivers relevant and correct information.…”
Section: Accuracy In Symptom Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant technological advancements and the incorporation of new features in monitoring devices, wearables still face certain limitations. One major pitfall lies in their accuracy in symptom detection, as there is considerable variability in sensitivity and specificity, ranging from 0.39 to 0.97, across different devices and study designs [9,55,[58][59][60]. It is not surprising that objective measurements do not always align perfectly with subjective symptom estimations, but the correlation between supervised and unsupervised motor function assessments is also not flawless [61].…”
Section: Pitfalls Of Wearable Technologies For Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of wearable technology to characterise clinical features has the potential to significantly improve the reliability, reproducibility, and accessibility of motor symptom assessment in PD [14][15][16][17]. Passive monitoring systems, for example, could autonomously assess motor symptoms through regular task-specific movements at home to reduce bias in subjective scoring [18][19][20]. Additionally, those systems could decrease the frequency of in-person clinic visits while offering a more comprehensive insight into symptoms throughout the day, thereby optimising treatment strategies and the management of PD symptoms [7,16,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%