2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward near real-time monitoring of forest disturbance by fusion of MODIS and Landsat data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pixel-level differences observed in the Western U.S. were mainly due to the smaller size of land patches (which is comparable to a MODIS pixel), as well as the distortion of MODIS pixels at middle to high latitude. Hence, it is not surprising that smaller change patches suffer more omission and/or commission errors than relatively larger patches [68], a conclusion consistent with previous land cover change studies using MODIS data [69]. Pixel-level errors are mostly distributed on the edge of land parcels, especially when the edge is between two or more disturbed patches where the disturbances occurred in different years (see Figure 9 for an illustration).…”
Section: Qualitative Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The pixel-level differences observed in the Western U.S. were mainly due to the smaller size of land patches (which is comparable to a MODIS pixel), as well as the distortion of MODIS pixels at middle to high latitude. Hence, it is not surprising that smaller change patches suffer more omission and/or commission errors than relatively larger patches [68], a conclusion consistent with previous land cover change studies using MODIS data [69]. Pixel-level errors are mostly distributed on the edge of land parcels, especially when the edge is between two or more disturbed patches where the disturbances occurred in different years (see Figure 9 for an illustration).…”
Section: Qualitative Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…To account for inherent noise in MODIS data due to cloud cover, atmospheric interference, and uncertainty in the ground area measured by the MODIS sensor (Xin et al, 2013), we used median NBAR values taken over 3 × 3 windows of 500 m pixels centered on PhenoCam locations. The resulting time series were then smoothed using the median of a three-point moving window to remove spikes due to snowfall and other sources of noise that were not captured using the MCD43A2 product.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the MCD12Q2 data are more susceptible to gridding artifacts of remote sensing measurements and other sources of noise (see Fig. 1 in Xin et al, 2013). Spatial averaging, which accounts for the values in neighboring pixels, appears to improve the remote sensing representation of deciduous canopy phenology in comparison to nearsurface measurements: the simple sigmoid method applied to MODIS NBAR data here yielded results with generally lower RMSD and bias with respect to ground measurements, relative to the MCD12Q2 product (Tables 4 and 7).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Phenology Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our algorithm does not account for this scale of sub-pixel variation, which means that results will be most reliable for areas with large field sizes. The effects of spatial heterogeneity is a common challenge for MODIS-based studies of land use and land cover change because most land use and land cover conversions occur below the spatial resolution of MODIS [68][69][70].…”
Section: Factors That Influence the Mapping Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%