2013
DOI: 10.1089/big.2013.0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward More Transparent and Reproducible Omics Studies Through a Common Metadata Checklist and Data Publications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limits the worldwide flow of bioinformatics knowledge necessary to build and train research groups with a solid bioinformatics background. Although there are several claims for more transparency and reproducibility of all the scientific process in biomedical literature (Sandve et al 2013;Kolker et al 2014;Iqbal et al 2016), advances Figure 1. Continental admixture of the EPIGEN-Brazil population-based cohorts.…”
Section: Addressing Lack Of Transparency and Reproducibility Of Genommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the worldwide flow of bioinformatics knowledge necessary to build and train research groups with a solid bioinformatics background. Although there are several claims for more transparency and reproducibility of all the scientific process in biomedical literature (Sandve et al 2013;Kolker et al 2014;Iqbal et al 2016), advances Figure 1. Continental admixture of the EPIGEN-Brazil population-based cohorts.…”
Section: Addressing Lack Of Transparency and Reproducibility Of Genommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we have developed a multiomics metadata checklist. The checklist will not only be used for collecting metadata for MOPED but also has been made available to the community at large through DELSA (www.delsaglobal.org) [63]. The metadata checklist is a harmonization strategy for omics data integration, analysis and use.…”
Section: Meta-data Checklist and Data Submissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longer term, however, more complex omics studies that include genomics together with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, autoantibody profiles and various clinical parameters are likely to raise the same kind of reproducibility and credibility and veracity problems, and perhaps require more careful attention to metadata norms. 171 For patenting diagnostic method claims, this is going to remain a problem as IP Australia will never have the ability to independently assess the reproducibility and credibility and veracity of these claims.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%