Toward More Comprehensive Evaluations of 3D Immersive Sketching, Drawing, and Painting

Machuca, Mayra Donaji Barrera; Israel, Johann Habakuk; Keefe, Daniel F.

doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3276291

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 128 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second difference is the medium and tools. Traditional art is mostly based on direct observation and assessment of the artwork itself, whereas 3D art evaluation involves both physical and digital forms of art [68]. Research shows that museums could provide virtual presentations to make the evaluation more interactive so that the value of digital art could be better understood [69].…”

Section: Evaluation Methods For 3d Artworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment

Yang,

Liu

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable digital cultural heritage is now an essential aspect of our lives. The rapid development of 3D technology in the historic preservation industry provides the means of documenting, recovering, and presenting cultural heritage items. However, the digital transformation of 3D sculpture heritage is often led by technology without effective evaluation indicators as a guide. This study compares effective assessment methods for digital forms with traditional art. Our approach uses semantic differential scales and machine learning regression models to assess the importance of fifteen artistic attributes. The semantic differential scale is improved based on 15 artistic attributes and proves to be effective in evaluating the value of digital artwork. This research finds that digital artwork is significantly more popular among young people compared with elderly people, especially for attributes like colour variation, saturation, and texture. The research also finds that complexity and social attributes are more important in predicting the value of the digital 3D model. Digital transformation is a viable method for preserving the artistic value of sculpture and improving cultural sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Methods For 3d Artworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment

Yang,

Liu

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several works rely on path design [45] or sketching as a way to define curves [7,8] or express design intent [17,46], which is also a relevant parameter type in pARam. This was also considered from an evaluation perspective by surveying the state of the art of how sketch-based systems are evaluated and highlighting the absence of standardized methods to do so [71]. Barrera Machuca et al further outline the types of sketches and interactions used in systems.…”

Section: Design In and For Extended Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Stemasov,

Demharter,

Rädler

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extended Reality (XR) allows in-situ previewing of designs to be manufactured through Personal Fabrication (PF). These in-situ interactions exhibit advantages for PF, like incorporating the environment into the design process. However, design-for-fabrication in XR often happens through either highly complex 3D-modeling or is reduced to rudimentary adaptations of crowd-sourced models. We present pARam, a tool combining parametric designs (PDs) and XR, enabling in-situ configuration of artifacts for PF. In contrast to modeling-or search-focused approaches, pARam supports customization through embodied and practical inputs (e.g., gestures, recommendations) and evaluation (e.g., lighting estimation) without demanding complex 3D-modeling skills. We implemented pARam for HoloLens 2 and evaluated it (𝑛 = 20), comparing XR and desktop conditions. Users succeeded in choosing context-related parameters and took their environment into account for their configuration using pARam. We reflect on the prospects and challenges of PDs in XR to streamline complex design methods for PF while retaining suitable expressivity. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Mixed / augmented reality; Interaction design.

show abstract

Generating Virtual Reality Stroke Gesture Data from Out-of-Distribution Desktop Stroke Gesture Data

Yuan,

Li,

Wang

et al. 2024

2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toward More Comprehensive Evaluations of 3D Immersive Sketching, Drawing, and Painting

Cited by 7 publications

References 128 publications

Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment

Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Generating Virtual Reality Stroke Gesture Data from Out-of-Distribution Desktop Stroke Gesture Data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About