2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-011-4458-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward molecular models of proton pumping: Challenges, methods and relevant applications

Abstract: Motivated by several long-lasting mechanistic questions for biomolecular proton pumps, we have engaged in developing hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods that allow an efficient and reliable description of long-range proton transport in transmembrane proteins. In this review, we briefly discuss several relevant issues: the need to develop a "multi-scale" generalized solvent boundary potential (GSBP) for the analysis of chemical events in large trans-membrane proteins, approaches to va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(183 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing results using DFTB3 models that differ in the description of water, we are able to confirm that proton transfer energetics are adequately described by the standard DFTB3/3OB model for meaningful mechanistic analyses. This finding is consistent with the approach that we have been employing to calibrate the DFTB models over the years for proton transfer studies, 12 , 63 , 92 , 186 , 187 i.e., focusing on proton affinities, p K a values, and relative solvation free energies of different protonation states (including hydroxide 12 ). Along this line, it is clear from the discussions here that a careful consideration of QM-MM interaction is also essential, and a robust parametrization requires an explicit consideration of condensed phase properties rather than gas phase clusters only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By comparing results using DFTB3 models that differ in the description of water, we are able to confirm that proton transfer energetics are adequately described by the standard DFTB3/3OB model for meaningful mechanistic analyses. This finding is consistent with the approach that we have been employing to calibrate the DFTB models over the years for proton transfer studies, 12 , 63 , 92 , 186 , 187 i.e., focusing on proton affinities, p K a values, and relative solvation free energies of different protonation states (including hydroxide 12 ). Along this line, it is clear from the discussions here that a careful consideration of QM-MM interaction is also essential, and a robust parametrization requires an explicit consideration of condensed phase properties rather than gas phase clusters only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…S13). Considering the limited amount of quantitative comparison between simulation and experiment regarding the properties of the conformational ensembles, and limitations of the PB/LRA approach in the presence of major structural transitions, it remains difficult to conclude which force field(s) studied here leads to results that are closer to reality. Indeed, what we aim to promote through this study is extensive comparisons between computation and experiment for multiple types of observables beyond the often targeted p K a values, so that we are confident that molecular simulations are able to “obtain the right answers for the right reasons” …”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Therefore, it is imperative to explicitly carry out computational analysis of phosphate monoester hydrolysis in the AP enzymes using our QM/MM approach. Due to the highly charged nature of phosphate monoesters, such calculations have not become possible until very recently due to the development of an improved QM-MM electrostatic model 37,38 for SCC-DFTB based QM/MM simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%