Toward inclusive green growth for sustainable development: A new perspective of labor market distortion

Abstract

Labor market distortion is ceaselessly endangering the balance among economic efficiency, social equity, and environmental quality sought by inclusive green growth and sustainable development. This study develops an innovative evaluation system to measure China's inclusive green growth by using provincial panel data from 2004 to 2020. Three dimensions are covered, including economic development, social equity and welfare, and green sustainability. Static and dynamic panel econometric models are employed to investigate the effect of labor market distortion on inclusive green growth and the potential transmission channels. The spatial econometric model is further applied to study the spatial spillover effect of labor market distortion on inclusive green growth. The results indicate that labor market distortion negatively affects inclusive green growth. Technological innovation, industrial structure optimization, and export trade upgrading are transmission channels of the impact of labor market distortion on inclusive green growth. In addition to hindering local inclusive green growth, labor market distortion also decreases neighboring inclusive green growth through the spatial spillover effect. These conclusions suggest that removing distortion in the labor market and emphasizing the role of market mechanisms in labor allocation may provide a new perspective to help move toward inclusive green growth for sustainable development.

Quantifying the Impact of Natural Resources on Sustainable Growth in Developing Economies: Evidence from Panel Nonlinear ARDL Technique

“…Furthermore, an increase in the labor force will put pressure on sustainable growth. As highlighted by Li et al (2023), labor market distortions limit the crucial impact of labor in the development of various economies. The outcomes indicate that the effect of labor on achieving sustainable growth is more pronounced in model (II) when compared to model (I).…”

A double machine learning model for measuring the impact of the Made in China 2025 strategy on green economic growth

“…This response helps enterprises improve input–output efficiency, achieve synergy between increasing production and emissions reduction, partially or completely offset the “environmental compliance cost” from environmental supervision, and realize the innovation compensation effect 58 . Second, strict environmental regulations can effectively mitigate the complicity of local governments and enterprises in focusing on economic growth while neglecting environmental protection 59 , urging local governments to constrain enterprises’ emissions, which compels enterprises to conduct technological innovation and pursue low-carbon transformation, promoting urban green economic growth.…”

Green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development: A systems thinking on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau in China

“…In China, several sustainable development indicators, grounded in composite indices, are employed to rank, score, and assess an array of factors pertaining to green growth across all provinces (CCIEE, 2022; Guan & Han, 2019; Han, 2021; Yi, 2020). Additional research has formulated a holistic evaluation system for green growth using the plan‐do‐check‐action cycle method (Guo et al, 2018); investigated provincial green growth levels using diverse indicators, shedding light on the relationship between green growth, green trade, and green energy (Li et al, 2022); and analyzed the impact of labor market distortions on inclusive green growth by exploring factors of economic growth, social equity and welfare, and environmental sustainability (Li et al, 2023). While these indicators are instrumental for national comparisons, yielding macro‐level policy insights, they often obscure the intricacies of green growth performance and progress within the unique context of individual provinces.…”