2023
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2022.3201255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Improving Actuation Transparency and Safety of a Hip Exoskeleton With a Novel Nonlinear Series Elastic Actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where m is the number of spring pairs, k s is the spring stiffness, l 0 is the rest length of spring. More details about the design and modeling of the reconfigurable RSEE can be found in our previous works [23], [24].…”
Section: Hip Exoskeleton Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where m is the number of spring pairs, k s is the spring stiffness, l 0 is the rest length of spring. More details about the design and modeling of the reconfigurable RSEE can be found in our previous works [23], [24].…”
Section: Hip Exoskeleton Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical drawbacks, such as friction and backlash, are neglected here. Different from conventional cascade PI controller that adopts a torque loop as the outer loop [29], [30], the cascade PI controller used in this work adopts a position loop as the outer loop while the inner loop is still a velocity loop, which can achieve a more accurate and stable torque control for the nSEA [24]. The desired deflection angle is online computed according to the desired torque utilizing Newton-Raphson method.…”
Section: B Inner-loop Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in portable walking-assist exoskeletons demonstrate considerable potential in improving the wearers' mobility, for instance, by reducing metabolic costs [5][6][7][8] or muscular activity [9,10]. Simultaneously, mechanical adaptations, e.g., serial elastic actuator [11] and quasi-direct driver [12], along with cognitive adaptations, such as admittance control [13], have been extensively researched to foster improved human-exoskeleton interactions. Despite the innovations, determining the exertion of forces and torques on the human body and understanding and predicting individual adaptation or response remain 2 of 16 unresolved challenges [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more powered robotic joints in wearable exoskeletons mean additional mass on the user's body and higher system complexity. Therefore, reported portable devices for post-stroke gait rehabilitation mainly focus on assisting single human joint, such as assist-on the hip joint [22], [23], ankle joint [7], [17], [24], [25], and knee joint [26], [27]. Devices with multi-active joints usually adopted entire rigid structures to transfer the system weight to the ground [2], leading to compromised wearability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%