2020
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.2983800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward High-Performance Wideband GNSS Antennas-Design Tradeoffs and Development of Wideband Feed Network Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To clearly explain the contribution of our work, a performance comparison with several state-of-the-art antennas (including wideband CP spiral) is summarized in Table II. As compared with the proposed antenna, the designs in [7], [8], [17], [18] and [19] show similar or wider IBW and AR bandwidth, but larger and more complex feeding networks were introduced in [7], [17], [18], and [19], and high profile of 0.24λ0 was employed in [8]. Besides, as another key performance, AR beamwidth were not taken into account in these works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To clearly explain the contribution of our work, a performance comparison with several state-of-the-art antennas (including wideband CP spiral) is summarized in Table II. As compared with the proposed antenna, the designs in [7], [8], [17], [18] and [19] show similar or wider IBW and AR bandwidth, but larger and more complex feeding networks were introduced in [7], [17], [18], and [19], and high profile of 0.24λ0 was employed in [8]. Besides, as another key performance, AR beamwidth were not taken into account in these works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, stacked or parasitic patches can be used to broaden AR bandwidth [4]- [5], but the achievable value is usually lower than 19% because of the inherent high Q-factor of patch antennas. External feeding networks and L-probe coupling techniques are introduced in [6]- [7] to further enhance the AR bandwidth, however, these methods unfortunately increase the overall size and complexity of the antennas as a byproduct. Besides, crossed-dipole antennas [8]- [9] can easily realize wideband CP feature, but they suffer from high profile of one quarter wavelength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain dual-or multi-mode navigation, wideband or multi-band circular polarized (CP) antennas have been reported. For example, the crossed-dipole structure, 1 monopole structure, 2 wideband feed network, 3,4 meta-surface, 5 spiral-slot structure, 6 and coupling feed technology 7 are separately proposed for realizing wideband operation. While stacked structure, [8][9][10] frequency-reconfigurable technology, 11 and two-element conformal structure 12,13 are often investigated to cover multi-frequency bands for compatible with different navigation systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But only the upper band realizes CP radiation, the lower band realizes linearly polarized radiation. Antennas 3,4 achieve wide impedance bandwidth and wide AR bandwidth by changing the feed structure, but this also causes the feed structure to be complex and difficult to fabricate. Because the patch antenna itself has a relatively narrow bandwidth and cannot cover the whole band of GNSS, the dipole antenna is mainly used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%