2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward genotype phenotype correlations in GFM1 mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine patients had liver involvement, which was originally reported as an important diagnostic hallmark of GFM1 ‐linked diseases. However, we only detected two cases of liver involvement in our cohort while Galmiche et al () did not identify GFM1 mutations as a prevalent cause of liver failure in a cohort of 26 patients. Interestingly, cardiomyopathy is underrepresented in patients with GFM1 mutations with only one single case of left ventricular hypertrophy being hitherto reported.…”
contrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nine patients had liver involvement, which was originally reported as an important diagnostic hallmark of GFM1 ‐linked diseases. However, we only detected two cases of liver involvement in our cohort while Galmiche et al () did not identify GFM1 mutations as a prevalent cause of liver failure in a cohort of 26 patients. Interestingly, cardiomyopathy is underrepresented in patients with GFM1 mutations with only one single case of left ventricular hypertrophy being hitherto reported.…”
contrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Using targeted exome sequencing (see supplemental information) we identified compound heterozygous or homozygous GFM1 variants in all nine patients. Two of the variants, NM_024996.5:c.2011C>T p.(Arg671Cys) in patients 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9 and NM_024996.5: c.1404del p.(Gly469Valfs*84) in patient 2 were previously reported (Brito et al, ; Calvo et al, ; Galmiche et al, ). Ten variants were identified for the first time (Figures a and a and Table S2) and include six, predictably pathogenic, missense mutations affecting evolutionary conserved amino acids NM_024996.5:c.958C>G p.(Pro320Ala); NM_024996.5:c.1922C>A p.(Ala641Glu); NM_024996.5:c.248A>T p.(Asp83Val); NM_024996.5:c.1546T>C p.(Cys516Arg); NM_024996.5:c.1571C>T p.(Ala524Val) and NM_024996.5:c.1822C>T p.(Arg608Trp) in patients 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9; one nonsense mutation, NM_024996.5:c.100C>T p.(Arg34*), in patient 6, leading to a premature stop codon in the mitochondrial targeting sequence of EFG1; one frameshift mutation causing a premature stop codon, NM_024996.5:c.1297_1300del p.(Asp433Lysfs*20) in patient 1; one deletion of four amino acids, NM_024996.5:c.1149_1160del p.(Ile384_Thr387del) in patient 4; and an intragenic duplication in patient 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A combined CI and CIV deficiency in patient heart and skeletal muscle, but isolated CIV deficiency in fibroblasts, indicates that the MRPL44 defect affects the respiratory chain in a tissue-specific manner. Variable tissue manifestations of respiratory chain deficiency are well documented in mitochondrial translation disorders, such as in the translation factor GFM1,28 29 but tissue-specificity in the case of ribosomal subunits is surprising, and the underlying mechanisms remain to be revealed 30–32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the TRMU gene, two genes have also been recently associated with early-onset liver disorders by translation defect: GFM1 (elongation factor EFG1) and TUFM (elongation factor EFTu). Nevertheless, the TRMU gene emerged as the best candidate gene, because liver dysfunction was present and predominant in all cases described (Valente et al 2007;Galmiche et al 2012;Zeharia et al 2009). Pathogenic TRMU mutations were found in every patient: c.835G>A (p.Val279Met)/c.248 þ 1G>A (splicing alteration) (P1); c.835G>A/c.649G>A (p.Glu217Lys) (P2); c.697C>T (p.Leu233Phe)/c.697C>T (P3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%