Legal Pluralism and Development 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139094597.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Equity in Development When the Law Is Not the Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spirit of continuing the process of 'reconstituting ownership over immovable property after the period of crisis from 1975 to 1979' (Article 29), the new law thus reversed the 1992 Land Law's exclusion of agricultural land from the legal definition of smallholder ownership, and outlined pathways for titling both individual smallholdings and indigenous communal lands (see also Grimsditch and Henderson, 2009;Adler and So, 2012). At the same time, however, it ended the establishment of new rights of possession, singling out 'the private property of the state and public legal entities' as a priority area where the practice of 'encroachment' via the establishment of possession rights needed to be stopped (Article 17).…”
Section: Background: the Political Economy Of 'Anarchic Encroachment'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spirit of continuing the process of 'reconstituting ownership over immovable property after the period of crisis from 1975 to 1979' (Article 29), the new law thus reversed the 1992 Land Law's exclusion of agricultural land from the legal definition of smallholder ownership, and outlined pathways for titling both individual smallholdings and indigenous communal lands (see also Grimsditch and Henderson, 2009;Adler and So, 2012). At the same time, however, it ended the establishment of new rights of possession, singling out 'the private property of the state and public legal entities' as a priority area where the practice of 'encroachment' via the establishment of possession rights needed to be stopped (Article 17).…”
Section: Background: the Political Economy Of 'Anarchic Encroachment'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titling has been a staple of Western development assistance in the global South since the mid-1990s, and has been increasingly embraced -if also significantly reframed -in the last half-decade since the "global land grab" debate began. While titling operations have, in the past, tended to prioritize areas where land tenure was relatively secure (Biddulph 2010;Adler and So 2012), and where tenure formalization thus offered the potential to provide large numbers of landholders with legal mechanisms for accessing credit ( de Soto 2000), discussions about titling are increasingly focusing on its potential to strengthen land tenure in the context of growing demand for agricultural land (FAO et al 2010;Dwyer 2015). Debates about titling -where, when, for whom and at what scale -have proliferated over the last few years, but have yet to create a policy consensus, let alone a workable solution to the governance issues associated with large-scale transnational land access.…”
Section: Land Titling: Why Where When -And What Else?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disjuncture between formal and de facto property is exacerbated by many states not even knowing the extent of their landholdings (FAO et al, 2010), and has in recent years been used to put large amounts of land into play through the blurring of both legal and cartographic boundaries (Cotula et al, 2009;Deininger and Byerlee, 2011;HLPE, 2011;Borras Jr. and Franco, 2012). This imprecise legal geography has major implications for investors who have been lured into socalled 'frontier' markets by promises of cheap and abundant state land (Adler and So, 2012;Borras Jr. and Franco, 2012;de Leon et al, 2013). If state land is actually state-owned in the sense of being demarcated and uncontested, it can give investors attractive incentives: 'one-stop' acquisition, efficient regulation and, most important, low cost of access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%