2018
DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Dynamic Prescribing Information: Codevelopment of Companion Model‐Informed Precision Dosing Tools in Drug Development

Abstract: Model‐informed precision dosing (MIPD) is biosimulation in healthcare to predict the drug dose for a given patient based on their individual characteristics that is most likely to improve efficacy and/or lower toxicity compared with traditional dosing. Despite widespread use of biosimulation in drug development, MIPD has not been adopted beyond academic‐hospital centers. A reason for this is that MIPD requires more supporting evidence in the language that everyday doctors understand—evidence‐based medicine. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though PGx and TDM are useful clinical tools for dose optimization, the optimal approach is to incorporate all relevant information about the drug’s PK/PD/PGx, using Model Informed Precision Dosing employs PKPD modeling and simulation (M&S) techniques in clinical care to optimize dose selection for an individual patient. This optimal dose is most likely to be associated with improved therapeutic outcomes, including optimal efficacy and minimal undesired events ( Darwich et al, 2017 , Polasek et al, 2018 , Tängdén et al, 2017 , Neely and Jelliffe, 2010 , Leroux et al, 2016 , Neely et al, 2016 , Neely et al, 2015 ). The capacity of model informed precision dosing to yield an optimal dose is due to the inherent ability of PKPD techniques to account for between-subject variability ( Collins and Varmus, 2015 ).…”
Section: Application In Clinical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though PGx and TDM are useful clinical tools for dose optimization, the optimal approach is to incorporate all relevant information about the drug’s PK/PD/PGx, using Model Informed Precision Dosing employs PKPD modeling and simulation (M&S) techniques in clinical care to optimize dose selection for an individual patient. This optimal dose is most likely to be associated with improved therapeutic outcomes, including optimal efficacy and minimal undesired events ( Darwich et al, 2017 , Polasek et al, 2018 , Tängdén et al, 2017 , Neely and Jelliffe, 2010 , Leroux et al, 2016 , Neely et al, 2016 , Neely et al, 2015 ). The capacity of model informed precision dosing to yield an optimal dose is due to the inherent ability of PKPD techniques to account for between-subject variability ( Collins and Varmus, 2015 ).…”
Section: Application In Clinical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of between-subject variability is noticed in clinical practice as one dose result in a range of drug concentrations and responses in a population ( Polasek et al, 2019 ). Between-subject variability is attributed to drug-related factors (such as drug-drug interactions and concurrent use of medications), PGx, and patient’s physiological and demographic factors (age, obesity, severity of diseases, and presence of comorbidities) ( Polasek et al, 2019 , Polasek et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Application In Clinical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These efforts and ongoing changes in our approach to labeling of medicines are important short‐term improvements. However, realizing the potential of truly individualized patient care and dosing will require larger transformative changes across the broader ecosystem spanning drug development, regulation, and utilization, as has been advocated in recent perspectives …”
Section: Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective of this study was to identify physiological and molecular characteristics driving variability in axitinib AUC SS using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Identification of these characteristics informs analyses of “exposure biomarkers” for axitinib that can be evaluated using routinely collected samples from randomized controlled trials, and will facilitate noninvasive precision dosing for this drug . The second objective of this study was to determine the predictive performance of the identified characteristics with respect to defining axitinib exposure by determining the capacity of a multivariable logistic regression model to identify patients most likely to fail to achieve an axitinib AUC SS above 300 ng/mL/hr with standard (5 mg twice daily) dosing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%