2009
DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00268-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Diagnosing Leishmania infantum Infection in Asymptomatic Dogs in an Area Where Leishmaniasis Is Endemic

Abstract: The most frequently used diagnostic methods were compared in a longitudinal survey with Leishmania infantum-infected asymptomatic dogs from an area of Italy where leishmaniasis is endemic. In February and March 2005, 845 asymptomatic dogs were tested by an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), a dipstick assay (DS), and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for L. infantum and by IFAT for Ehrlichia canis. Dogs seronegative for L. infantum were further parasitologically evaluated by microscopic examin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
61
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(44 reference statements)
4
61
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in infected asymptomatic dogs, the lymph node showed a much lower positivity rate of 5% in dogs without clinical signs and 71% relative performance in dogs categorized as infected (35). These results suggest that LN-CE should not be considered among the first-line tests for CanL diagnosis in asymptomatic dogs, because of poor aspiration performance in nonenlarged lymph nodes and the intrinsic low parasite burden resulting from an effective immune response in most of the asymptomatic animals (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, in infected asymptomatic dogs, the lymph node showed a much lower positivity rate of 5% in dogs without clinical signs and 71% relative performance in dogs categorized as infected (35). These results suggest that LN-CE should not be considered among the first-line tests for CanL diagnosis in asymptomatic dogs, because of poor aspiration performance in nonenlarged lymph nodes and the intrinsic low parasite burden resulting from an effective immune response in most of the asymptomatic animals (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The drawbacks of PCR are lack of standardization of the different protocols used among laboratories, possibility of contamination, and the fact that it does not necessarily indicate infection with live Leishmania (1,13,18,30). Serologic assays may yield false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with sera of dogs infected with L. braziliensis, T. cruzi, T. caninum, and Ehrlichia canis (15,(31)(32)(33). Also, they do not necessarily indicate current infection (10) and do not differentiate positive results produced by natural infection from those induced by vaccines (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the LRP antigen mixture detected all the asymptomatic cases (100%), the assay with the SLA preparation detected only about 19% of the cases. Although the reactivity against LRP needs further confirmation by use of a larger number of serum samples from asymptomatic dogs, the use of LRP-based ELISAs in combination with other proposed parasitological, cellular, and serological tests may be useful for the detection of asymptomatic dogs in areas of endemicity (11,38). In addition, we are analyzing the correlation between seroreactivity against LRP and the transmission of the parasites to the insect vector, as well as the clinical evolution of LRPpositive asymptomatic dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%