Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Developing Techniques─Agnostic Machine Learning Classification Models for Forensically Relevant Glass Fragments

Abstract: Glass fragments found in crime scenes may constitute important forensic evidence when properly analyzed, for example, to determine their origin. This analysis could be greatly helped by having a large and diverse database of glass fragments and by using it for constructing reliable machine learning (ML)-based glass classification models. Ideally, the samples that make up this database should be analyzed by a single accurate and standardized analytical technique. However, due to differences in equipment across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another paper by the same research group was very similar in approach to the previous one but instead of only using data from PIXE analyses, LA-ICP-MS, PIGE, SEM-EDS and prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis (PGAA) was also used. 290 As well as random forest, support vector machine was also tested for classification. However, the random forest performed better.…”
Section: Forensic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another paper by the same research group was very similar in approach to the previous one but instead of only using data from PIXE analyses, LA-ICP-MS, PIGE, SEM-EDS and prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis (PGAA) was also used. 290 As well as random forest, support vector machine was also tested for classification. However, the random forest performed better.…”
Section: Forensic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%