2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13057-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Detection of Child Exploitation Material: A Forensic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a forensically sound process 2 , is one that integrates automated investigative analysis-evaluated through scientific (accuracy and precision) metricswith human assessments of the outcome. For example, a DF investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) [16,17] may seek to automatically detect and classify images of people found on a seized device as adult or underage (based on automatic estimated age). Because of possible misrepresentation in the dataset, misclassification (i.e., false positive), misinterpretation of features, and missing of critical features during the classification process that could have served as evidence (false negative; e.g., an underage wearing adult facial makeup) may occur [18].…”
Section: Methods For Evaluating Dfai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a forensically sound process 2 , is one that integrates automated investigative analysis-evaluated through scientific (accuracy and precision) metricswith human assessments of the outcome. For example, a DF investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) [16,17] may seek to automatically detect and classify images of people found on a seized device as adult or underage (based on automatic estimated age). Because of possible misrepresentation in the dataset, misclassification (i.e., false positive), misinterpretation of features, and missing of critical features during the classification process that could have served as evidence (false negative; e.g., an underage wearing adult facial makeup) may occur [18].…”
Section: Methods For Evaluating Dfai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…648 March 2022 Biometric detection and extraction approaches, in particular, can increase investigatory capacity and enhance CSAM investigations. These tools typically rely on the detection of 'primary' biometric modalities including faces (Macedo, Costa, & dos Santos 2018;Ulges & Stahl 2011) but also use other 'soft' biometric modalities to detect nudity (de Castro Polastro & da Silva Eleuterio 2010;Vitorino et al 2018), skin tones (Islam, Watters & Yearwood 2011;Sae-Bae et al 2014;Yaqub, Mohanty & Memon 2018), and subject age (Gangwar et al 2021;Islam et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%