2016
DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Defining the Threshold Between Low and High Glucose Variability in Diabetes

Abstract: A %CV of 36% appears to be a suitable threshold to distinguish between stable and unstable glycemia in diabetes because beyond this limit, the frequency of hypoglycemia is significantly increased, especially in insulin-treated subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
214
2
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
214
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…By CGM analysis with a large number of participants, we have shown here that the duration of hypoglycemia was inversely correlated with HbA 1c level in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. Whereas previous CGM‐based studies with smaller numbers of participants showed that hypoglycemia occurs more frequently in individuals treated with sulfonylureas than in those not taking these drugs, the relationship between HbA 1c level and the duration of hypoglycemia was not analyzed in these studies. A meta‐analysis found that the incidence of hypoglycemia was inversely correlated with baseline HbA 1c level in type 2 diabetes patients who initiated medications, including sulfonylureas, with the development of hypoglycemia being detected by symptoms or self‐monitoring of blood glucose, which does not allow quantitative assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By CGM analysis with a large number of participants, we have shown here that the duration of hypoglycemia was inversely correlated with HbA 1c level in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. Whereas previous CGM‐based studies with smaller numbers of participants showed that hypoglycemia occurs more frequently in individuals treated with sulfonylureas than in those not taking these drugs, the relationship between HbA 1c level and the duration of hypoglycemia was not analyzed in these studies. A meta‐analysis found that the incidence of hypoglycemia was inversely correlated with baseline HbA 1c level in type 2 diabetes patients who initiated medications, including sulfonylureas, with the development of hypoglycemia being detected by symptoms or self‐monitoring of blood glucose, which does not allow quantitative assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We previously reported the association of glycaemic fluctuations, as detected by CGM, with hypoglycaemia in patients with T2D . Glycaemic fluctuations increase the risk of hypoglycaemia, regardless of the treatment used, including oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin . Night‐time glycaemic fluctuations are also known to affect the quality of sleep, indicating that prevention of such fluctuations may lead to improved sleep quality and quality of life for patients with diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An international consensus of expert opinion concluded that the CoV should become the primary measure of GV, with SD as a key secondary measure . Stable glucose levels were defined as a CoV under 36%, and unstable glucose levels were defined as a CoV of at least 36% . This provides a metric against which glucose data can be assessed and clinical intervention can be judged.…”
Section: Definition Of Glycaemic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study demonstrated that, in individuals without diabetes, mean GV measured by coefficient of variation (CoV) during the day and during the night was 17% ± 3% and 13% ± 4%, respectively, with a median of 96% of time spent between 70 and 140 mg/dL (3.9‐7.8 mmol/L) . Data concerning individuals with T1DM suggest that even those patients with so‐called “good variability” demonstrate a CoV of approximately 37%, which is more than twice that of individuals without diabetes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%