2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Consistent Assignment of Structural Domains in Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper cites some examples of proteins (1AVHA, 1TAHB, 5FBP, 1GPB, 1SMR, and 1CHRA) for which there is no consensus on domain definitions between the established methods. On examining these proteins by our method, we find that the results obtained from both PBG as well as PScG representation agree very well with CATH and to a good extent with AUTHORS (This is an annotation given by Veretnik et al 9 for domain definitions given by the authors of the respective crystal structure papers as compiled by Islam et al 5 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Present Methods With Scop Cath And Domainsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper cites some examples of proteins (1AVHA, 1TAHB, 5FBP, 1GPB, 1SMR, and 1CHRA) for which there is no consensus on domain definitions between the established methods. On examining these proteins by our method, we find that the results obtained from both PBG as well as PScG representation agree very well with CATH and to a good extent with AUTHORS (This is an annotation given by Veretnik et al 9 for domain definitions given by the authors of the respective crystal structure papers as compiled by Islam et al 5 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Present Methods With Scop Cath And Domainsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Subsequent to the completion of the current work, Veretnik et al 9 reported their findings on domain definitions by various methods. This paper cites some examples of proteins (1AVHA, 1TAHB, 5FBP, 1GPB, 1SMR, and 1CHRA) for which there is no consensus on domain definitions between the established methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Present Methods With Scop Cath And Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A domain is either defined based on sequence (regions that display a significant level of sequence similarity), function (the minimal part of a gene that is capable of performing a function) or structure (compact, spatially distinct units of protein structure) [38]. When the structure of the protein is known, its domains are usually defined by a combination of visual inspection of the structure with automated methods that take into account the globular nature of domains (for a review of existing methods, see [38]). It would be of practical interest to delineate domain boundaries in protein sequence alone, as this information would facilitate structure and function prediction.…”
Section: Blv62: Information In Each Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could also match known structures using structural alignment (25). Parsing the chains into structural domains could be done as described above for sequence matching and augmented with automated domain finding programs (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%