2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8en00389k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward computational and experimental characterisation for risk assessment of metal oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: In silicomethods provide an alternative and reliable route for the toxicity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(74 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past few decades, researchers and energy experts are closely collaborating in a wide range of research activities to mitigate the harmful impacts of power generation to ensure sustainable power generation and environmental protection. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, researchers and energy experts are closely collaborating in a wide range of research activities to mitigate the harmful impacts of power generation to ensure sustainable power generation and environmental protection. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What it is more important with data and nanoinformatics is that the machine learning tools and QSAR/QSPR models for the correlation of nanomaterial properties with toxicity, exposure, and hazard assessment can support the policy adaptivity to new nanotechnologies in the future upon standardization [ 57 ]. Thus, design procedures can be used to maximize nanomaterial utility while there is compliance with European Commission and global strategies to replace, reduce, and refine (3R principles), which aims to reduce adverse biological effects and support ethical science by reducing the tests performed using animals [ 47 , 49 ].…”
Section: Selection Of Nanomaterials Tailored For Improvements In Qual...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent machine learning models contain the quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) and nanostructure–activity relationships (QNAR) concerning the toxicological effect prediction of engineered nanomaterials using compartment-based mathematical models for toxicokinetic, toxicodynamic, in vitro and in vivo dosimetry, and environmental fate. EU reports, projects, and nanosafety clusters have assessed their applicability for regulatory purposes and to provide proper REACH guidance [ 21 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. All these methods have been established for years, and the developed regulations/standards or SOPs satisfy the reproducibility and interoperability needs for the consolidated reporting of properties and behavior, while also satisfy the demand for safe nanomaterials by design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although more experiments need to be conducted to verify the theory, it points out a possible way for designing biomaterials. [ 197 ] Currently, two strategies are widely used to regulate the potential of the interface.…”
Section: Advanced Designs Of Implants With Charge‐transfer Monitoring or Regulating Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%