2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Comprehensive Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Annotation Using FluoroMatch Software and Intelligent High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry Acquisition

Abstract: Thousands of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exist in the environment and pose a potential health hazard. Suspect and non-target screening with liquid chromatography (LC) high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HRMS/MS) can be used for comprehensive characterization of PFAS. To date no automated open source PFAS data analysis software exists to mine these extensive datasets. We introduce FluoroMatch, which automates file conversion, chromatographic peak picking, blank feature filtering, PFAS annota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(83 reference statements)
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration points, blanks, and daily, weekly, and 5-week composite samples were analyzed using an alternating full MS and all ion fragmentation (AIF) method. Additionally, the 5-week composite samples were analyzed using data dependent MS2 (ddMS2) analysis with an iterative inclusion approach, which has similar advantages to previously reported intelligent acquisition methods (57,58). Briefly, we used the full scan data to generate inclusion lists including all features after blank filtering to ensure ddMS2 spectra were collected for each peak in the three 5-week composite samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration points, blanks, and daily, weekly, and 5-week composite samples were analyzed using an alternating full MS and all ion fragmentation (AIF) method. Additionally, the 5-week composite samples were analyzed using data dependent MS2 (ddMS2) analysis with an iterative inclusion approach, which has similar advantages to previously reported intelligent acquisition methods (57,58). Briefly, we used the full scan data to generate inclusion lists including all features after blank filtering to ensure ddMS2 spectra were collected for each peak in the three 5-week composite samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I met several other scientists via the taskforce, who I now have active collaborations with. So far, we have four publications related to PFAS (Koelmel et al, 2020, Koelmel et al, 2021Nason et al, 2020;Hagstrom et al, 2021) and two funded grant proposals, with more in progress! My work on this collaborative community project kick started all these additional activities.…”
Section: An Ongoing Storymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of November 2020, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has compiled a list of over 8000 PFAS structures [28] made available via their CompTox Chemicals Dashboard [29]. This list is not exhaustive and previous studies have found compounds that are not contained on the list [30]. At the time of writing, the dashboard has less than one million chemicals (~883,000) and other databases such as CAS SciFinder, ChemSpider, and PubChem each contain tens of millions of substances with additional tens of thousands of PFAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the original release of FluoroMatch [30] used a suspect screening approach that targeted compounds based on available MS/MS spectra acquired from standards and information available in literature, FluoroMatch 2.0 uses truly nontargeted methods which can be used to enhance the identification and discovery of known, uncommon, and unknown PFAS. FluoroMatch 2.0 introduces an automated workflow which includes blank filtering, mass defect filtering, Kendrick mass defect plots (normalized to CF 2 ) [33], retention time pattern analysis, and exact mass matching to take full advantage of retention time and exact mass data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%