2018
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201802540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Biomaterials for Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy

Abstract: Despite the remarkable progress in immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy for cancer treatment, low objective response and immune‐related side effects (immune‐related adverse events, irAEs) limit the further development of ICBs. To address these challenges and enhance the efficiency of cancer immunotherapy, the emerging interest has focused on manipulating biomaterials to form innovational drug delivery systems that are necessary to effectively deliver immune checkpoint inhibitors. Such biomaterial‐based str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
(268 reference statements)
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] Unfortunately, the development of ICB therapy is compro mised with the immunosuppressive TME. [17][18][19] Recently, many researchers have proposed that the immunogenic death effect resulting from the traditional treatments, and innate immu nity elicited by immune agonists or microorganisms could efficiently improve the antitumor effect of ICB therapy. [20][21][22][23] However, the immune system damage induced by tradi tional treatments and autoimmunity evoked by agonists or microorganisms cannot be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Unfortunately, the development of ICB therapy is compro mised with the immunosuppressive TME. [17][18][19] Recently, many researchers have proposed that the immunogenic death effect resulting from the traditional treatments, and innate immu nity elicited by immune agonists or microorganisms could efficiently improve the antitumor effect of ICB therapy. [20][21][22][23] However, the immune system damage induced by tradi tional treatments and autoimmunity evoked by agonists or microorganisms cannot be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, tumors are immunologically “cold” because of the infiltration of immunosuppressive M2 macrophages . Modulating cold tumors into an inflammatory state (i.e., “hot” tumor) becomes one critical challenge for antitumor immunotherapy . It has been demonstrated that oxidative stress acts as a cellular secondary messenger in inflammation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research Articles antitumor immunotherapy. [21] It has been demonstrated that oxidative stress acts as ac ellular secondary messenger in inflammation. [16,22] Therefore,w ea ssume that Cu 2Àx Te NEs with oxidative stress generating ability may skew M2 macrophages into ap roinflammatory M1 phenotype.T ov alidate our assumption, macrophages were polarized to the M2 phenotype with interleukin 4( IL-4).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evading Immunosurveillance by completely eluding or retarding the extent of immunogenicity is appeared to recognize as a major hallmark of cancer, and several hypothesizes have been reported so far that explains, to some extent, why would some cancer cells survive in an immunocompetent environment . One hypothesis indicates that deregulated tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in the survival and dissemination of tumor .…”
Section: Cellular Players Impeded Antitumor Immune Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%