2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11707-012-0339-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne LiDAR data and high resolution Remote Sensing images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to differences in viewing geometry and information content, the algorithms and methods designed for ALS data cannot be directly translated for MLS data. In addition, many methods proposed to extract individual trees from ALS data are based on either the original point clouds data directly (e.g., [38][39][40]) or the interpolated Digital Surface Model (or Canopy Height Model) in raster format (e.g., [18,23,24,41]). In contrast, methods for processing MLS data have to directly deal with laser scanning point cloud in order to preserve and extract the faç ade structures under the rooftop or tree canopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to differences in viewing geometry and information content, the algorithms and methods designed for ALS data cannot be directly translated for MLS data. In addition, many methods proposed to extract individual trees from ALS data are based on either the original point clouds data directly (e.g., [38][39][40]) or the interpolated Digital Surface Model (or Canopy Height Model) in raster format (e.g., [18,23,24,41]). In contrast, methods for processing MLS data have to directly deal with laser scanning point cloud in order to preserve and extract the faç ade structures under the rooftop or tree canopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolated trees could be detected with high accuracy, which is likely the main reason for the good overall detection result, and thus indicates the algorithm is suitable for urban applications. Although the validation results in the backyard Krausnickpark has been positive, non-dominant trees in dense stocks and located near rooftops are likely to be overlooked by the local maxima algorithm in several locations of the study transect [12]. These are probably the main reasons for the high underestimations of the reference trees in park groves and backyards and the overall underestimation of 17 trees (93 detected trees − (64 assigned trees + 12 false trees) = 17 trees).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Very high resolution multispectral images such as QuickBird enable a detailed separation of vegetation and non-vegetation, even in dense urban areas, and provide an important information source for further combined analysis with airborne LiDAR [10,[12][13][14]. Using airborne LiDAR data, tree carbon assessments have been successfully completed for an entire tree stock [15], and for single trees by using neighbored pixel information [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is computed as the difference between the digital surface model (DSM) and the digital elevation model (DEM). In our study, the DSM was generated from the airborne LiDAR point clouds by using the linear triangulated irregular network (TIN) interpolation method [23][24][25][26]. The DEM was then interpolated from the ground points which was classified using a progressive morphological filter [55].…”
Section: Building Contours Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%