2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward automated classification of acetabular shape in ultrasound for diagnosis of DDH: Contour alpha angle and the rounding index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), and (ii) an approximate line of action for the force of gravity, in calculation of loads, stresses and strains at the hip joint. Purely geometric measurements taken to assess hip dysplasia on 3-D ultrasound, such as the Graf alpha angle or novel indices which are currently in development seeking to characterize the 3-D morphology of the hip (192021), would be made with respect to patient-specific acetabular landmarks as seen on the individual ultrasound images, and are independent of iliac angle variation. Further, an exact measurement is not necessary as biomechanical modeling can include a sensitivity analysis testing the effect on hip stability of the entire expected ±15° range of random individual variation in the Iliac angle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), and (ii) an approximate line of action for the force of gravity, in calculation of loads, stresses and strains at the hip joint. Purely geometric measurements taken to assess hip dysplasia on 3-D ultrasound, such as the Graf alpha angle or novel indices which are currently in development seeking to characterize the 3-D morphology of the hip (192021), would be made with respect to patient-specific acetabular landmarks as seen on the individual ultrasound images, and are independent of iliac angle variation. Further, an exact measurement is not necessary as biomechanical modeling can include a sensitivity analysis testing the effect on hip stability of the entire expected ±15° range of random individual variation in the Iliac angle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acetabular contact angle were found to be unhelpful. The acetabular contact angle, another 3D index of acetabular angularity, was previously found to be highly accurate for diagnosis of DDH (18). In that study, the acetabular contact angle was calculated on smooth, manually segmented acetabular surface models.…”
Section: Pediatric Imaging: Developmental Hip Dysplasia Diagnosis At mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By December 31, 2016, we had 1884 consecutively scanned hips, performed at mean age 67 days (age range, 3-238 days; Fig 1). In some of our early work (16)(17)(18) relatively high interobserver (6)(7)(8) and interscan (9,10) variability, potentially altering the final diagnosis in 50%-75% of infants if scanned by a nonexpert (8). In practice, over diagnosis of DDH leads to increased health care costs and unnecessary treatment (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations