2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an understanding of the function of Chlamydiales in plastid endosymbiosis

Abstract: Plastid endosymbiosis defines a process through which a fully evolved cyanobacterial ancestor has transmitted to a eukaryotic phagotroph the hundreds of genes required to perform oxygenic photosynthesis, together with the membrane structures, and cellular compartment associated with this process. In this review, we will summarize the evidence pointing to an active role of Chlamydiales in metabolic integration of free living cyanobacteria, within the cytosol of the last common plant ancestor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings led to the suggestion that cyanobacterial and chlamydial endosymbionts coexisted in an early eukaryotic host cell, and that this tripartite relationship was responsible for the transformation of cyanobacterial endosymbionts into modern-day plastids 30,67,69,70 . Although it has been argued that these chlamydiae-related genes could have resulted from phylogenetic artefacts or could have existed in the cyanobacterial progenitor of plastids [71][72][73] , some of these genes are only adaptive in parasitic or heterotrophic bacteria and are not found in extant cyanobacteria, suggesting that chlamydial involvement in plastid establishment is plausible 30,67,68,74 . Non-cyanobacterial prokaryotes other than chlamydiae also contributed genes for plastid genesis and functionality 69,[75][76][77] .…”
Section: Hgt In Eukaryotic Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These findings led to the suggestion that cyanobacterial and chlamydial endosymbionts coexisted in an early eukaryotic host cell, and that this tripartite relationship was responsible for the transformation of cyanobacterial endosymbionts into modern-day plastids 30,67,69,70 . Although it has been argued that these chlamydiae-related genes could have resulted from phylogenetic artefacts or could have existed in the cyanobacterial progenitor of plastids [71][72][73] , some of these genes are only adaptive in parasitic or heterotrophic bacteria and are not found in extant cyanobacteria, suggesting that chlamydial involvement in plastid establishment is plausible 30,67,68,74 . Non-cyanobacterial prokaryotes other than chlamydiae also contributed genes for plastid genesis and functionality 69,[75][76][77] .…”
Section: Hgt In Eukaryotic Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another possibility is nitrogen fixation, an idea not without merit in light of gene content similarities between gene-rich heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria and photosynthetic eukaryotes [72]. The possible existence of a third player in the primary endosymbiotic origin of plastids is actively being debated, more specifically a (no longer present) Chlamydia-like pathogen proposed to have been impacting glycogen metabolism in the eukaryotic host at around the time the cyanobacterium came on the scene (see [92][93][94] and references therein for discussion). Whatever the reason(s), endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT), together with the evolution of the TIC-TOC translocon, led to the establishment of the primary plastid and the very first autotrophic eukaryote.…”
Section: Eukaryotic Photosynthesis: Origin and Spreadmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their ‘ ménage à trois ’ hypothesis, Ball et al . () even hypothesised that this ancestor contained a chlamydial endosymbiont, which would have provided key genes in establishing the primary plastid; the existence of such an endosymbiont is controversial and hotly debated (discussed in Deschamps, ; Zimorski et al., ; Ball et al., ; Domman et al., ). It is more likely that Chlamydiae engulfed as food or present as intracellular pathogens represented the source of these genes.…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of the Classical Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%