2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00369g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an understanding of electronic excitation energies beyond the molecular orbital picture

Abstract: Can we gain an intuitive understanding of excitation energies beyond the molecular picture?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
137
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
2
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TheoDORE 2.2 program 93,94 was used for this purpose, through the analysis of the one-particle transition density matrix 95,96 which will also allow for the comparison with existing data. For the weakly bound (inter-molecular) CT complexes, each of the weakly interacting molecules of the complex is defined as a fragment to carry out the exciton analysis using the following descriptors [97][98][99] As a benchmarking case, the metrics computed for the benzene-TCNE example (Ω POS = 1.50 and Ω CT = 0.98, for all the DH methods) perfectly agrees with those calculated from an in-depth analysis of the linear response TD-DFT transition density matrix 43 : a negligible orbital overlap between the frontier molecular orbitals (the S 1 S 0 excitation is a π !…”
Section: Identification Of Charge-transfer Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TheoDORE 2.2 program 93,94 was used for this purpose, through the analysis of the one-particle transition density matrix 95,96 which will also allow for the comparison with existing data. For the weakly bound (inter-molecular) CT complexes, each of the weakly interacting molecules of the complex is defined as a fragment to carry out the exciton analysis using the following descriptors [97][98][99] As a benchmarking case, the metrics computed for the benzene-TCNE example (Ω POS = 1.50 and Ω CT = 0.98, for all the DH methods) perfectly agrees with those calculated from an in-depth analysis of the linear response TD-DFT transition density matrix 43 : a negligible orbital overlap between the frontier molecular orbitals (the S 1 S 0 excitation is a π !…”
Section: Identification Of Charge-transfer Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is further explored here, hopefully complementing previous studies [20,21] after inspecting first the corresponding theoretical expression in which the TD‐DFT singlet‐triplet gap is based. Additionally, we will try to provide insights, beyond the one‐electron molecular picture, [31] to understand why (highly) correlated methods are able to cope with the underlying electronic structure of these systems, and thus predicting the correct order and energy of excited‐states, contrarily to what happens with TD‐DFT. This theoretical understanding could pave the way towards the theoretical design of other closed‐shell organic molecules with inverted excited‐states and therefore with prospects in optoelectronic and photocatalytic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a more formal viewpoint it is worth pointing out that there is a specific hierarchy between frontier orbitals, biradical character/NTOs, and the shielding tensors. Frontier orbitals are simply intermediates in approximate theories and it is well-known that their shapes and energies change dramatically with the level of theory chosen [47,75]. Measures for biradical character and the NTOs can be defined based on the wavefunctions alone [24,66,76] and are, thus, well-defined without any explicit reference to a computational level of theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%