1997
DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.005682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an optimal foundation architecture for optoelectronic computing Part I Regularly interconnected device planes

Abstract: By systematically examining the tree of possibilities for optoelectronic computing architectures and offering arguments that allow one to prune suboptimal branches of this tree, I come to the conclusion that electronic circuit planes interconnected optically according to regular connection patterns represent an alternative that is reasonably close to the best possible, as defined by physical limitations. Thus I propose that this foundation architecture should provide a basis for future research and development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since that time, a body of work (see, for example, [4] and [6]- [33]) has addressed potential benefits and limits of optics for interconnection [4], [7], [8], [12], [14]- [16], [20], [23], [24], [28], analysis of the relative benefits of optics versus electronics [4], [6], [9]- [11], [13], [21], [22], [26], [27], [30], [31], [33], and comparison of different kinds of optical approaches against one another [17]- [19], [25], [29]. Several of these papers review parts of this work (e.g., [20], [22], [27], and [28]).…”
Section: A Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, a body of work (see, for example, [4] and [6]- [33]) has addressed potential benefits and limits of optics for interconnection [4], [7], [8], [12], [14]- [16], [20], [23], [24], [28], analysis of the relative benefits of optics versus electronics [4], [6], [9]- [11], [13], [21], [22], [26], [27], [30], [31], [33], and comparison of different kinds of optical approaches against one another [17]- [19], [25], [29]. Several of these papers review parts of this work (e.g., [20], [22], [27], and [28]).…”
Section: A Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is necessary to complement these tools with physically accurate models of interconnection media. Such analytical models for normally conducting, repeatered, superconducting, and optical interconnections which take into account the skin effect, both unterminated and terminated lines, optimization of repeater configurations, superconducting penetration depth and critical current densities, optical diffraction, and similar effects have been developed in [54] and subsequently applied to determine the limitations of these interconnection media and their relative strengths and weaknesses [54,52,47,46,57]. Treating inverse signal delay S and bandwidth B as performance parameters, these studies characterize systems with N elements by surfaces of physical possibility in S-B-N space, which are to be compared with surfaces of algorithmic necessity in the same space.…”
Section: Fundamental Studies Of Interconnectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies are part of a specific development effort, but the results nevertheless have general applicability or implications. [29,30,31] 5.5. PHYSICAL SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT Many different systems employing optical interconnections in one form or another have been or are being developed.…”
Section: Multi-faceted System-level Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%