2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2731876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Online Minimum Number of Controls for Relieving Overloads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the objective function (11) Only when steel core temperature exceeding the long-term allowable operation temperature T l,limit , the thermal accumulation W steel l,t in safe operation constraint ( 21) of transmission lines is enabled to start to calculate. The judgment factor Y is employed to realize this logical judgment; thus, the calculation equation of…”
Section: Model Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the objective function (11) Only when steel core temperature exceeding the long-term allowable operation temperature T l,limit , the thermal accumulation W steel l,t in safe operation constraint ( 21) of transmission lines is enabled to start to calculate. The judgment factor Y is employed to realize this logical judgment; thus, the calculation equation of…”
Section: Model Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific to the overload problem of transmission lines due to power flow transferring after a fault event in power grid, the existing post-contingency power flow control (PPFC) strategies mainly employ measures of adjusting the active power injected into the nodes of the power network (e.g., altering the output of generators and shedding loads) to eliminate the overload conditions of transmission lines. These methods can be classified into two types: (a) sensitivity methods [8]- [11], and (b) optimization control methods [12]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• First‐order sensitivities of the objective and constraints with respect to controls adjustment [4, 8, 9, 12] or combining such sensitivities and mixed‐integer linear programming (MILP) [4, 8, 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPF‐LNC problems have been approached up to now via various techniques such as • Mathematical programming with complementarity constraints [11]. • First‐order sensitivities of the objective and constraints with respect to controls adjustment [4, 8, 9, 12] or combining such sensitivities and mixed‐integer linear programming (MILP) [4, 8, 9]. • Approximation of the integer constraint limiting the number of control actions via fuzzy continuous non‐linear functions [11, 13] or sigmoid functions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactive power optimisation can be solved via a conventional optimal power-flow formulation; however, the number of control actions is often too large to be executed [1]. Various schemes have been proposed for limiting the number of VAR control adjustments [2,3]. The cost of adjusting control devices is taken into account to avoid excessive control actions [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%