Religion in International Relations 2003
DOI: 10.1057/9781403982360_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an International Political Theology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is no longer tenable and it amounts to naivety to overlook or treat as inconsequential the impact of religion in the contemporary nation-state system and its sovereign paraphernalia. For as Kubalkova (2006) cautions "if we in the field of international relations think that these pathologies, and the consequences of ignoring them, are the proper subject of some other field of inquiry, then we become irrelevant to modern society". Therefore, the rationalist ontology of the discipline and the conservatism that underlie it need to be transcended.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is no longer tenable and it amounts to naivety to overlook or treat as inconsequential the impact of religion in the contemporary nation-state system and its sovereign paraphernalia. For as Kubalkova (2006) cautions "if we in the field of international relations think that these pathologies, and the consequences of ignoring them, are the proper subject of some other field of inquiry, then we become irrelevant to modern society". Therefore, the rationalist ontology of the discipline and the conservatism that underlie it need to be transcended.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la creciente bibliografía que explora el papel de la religión y la teología tanto en Westfalia como en las relaciones internacionales en general podrían mencionarse, por ejemplo, "The religious roots of modern international relations" (Philpott, 2000), "International Political Theology" (Kubálková, 2006) o Christian theology and World Politics (Mia Luoma-Aho, 2013), por no mencionar la inmensa cantidad de artículos y libros sobre el papel de la religión en el terrorismo internacional o en la configuración de identidades y redes de cooperación. No obstante, hasta donde se logra ver aquí, todos los trabajos mencionados realizan su análisis desde una epistemología y ontología modernas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Philpott 2000Philpott , 2002Kubálková 2000Kubálková , 2003Kubálková , 2009Fox and Sandler 2004;Hurd 2004;Leustean 2005;Philpott and Shah 2006;Kratochvíl 2009;Sandal 2011; for comparative politics see Gill 2001). 4 Jeffrey Haynes (2011Haynes ( , 2012, for instance, comments individually on all the key IR theoretical traditions and their relation to religion while others underline specifically the role of social constructivism, which is best able to bridge the gap between the study of international relations and that of sociology of religion (Hassner 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leustean (2005), on the contrary, suggests starting with the micro-level and strengthening the research by incorporating the activities and perceptions of individuals, too. An even more radical rethinking of the whole IR theory was proposed by Vendulka Kubálková (2000). In her influential piece, where she defended the establishment of international political theology, she addressed the question whether religion can be simply added to the other phenomena the discipline studied or whether an epistemological transformation of the whole discipline is needed for the proper understanding of the role of religion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%