Toward an innovative approach of financing infrastructure in Asia

Abstract

Infrastructure development is critical for sustaining Asia’s economic growth. Unfortunately, huge financing gaps—estimated by a recent Asian Development Bank study to be USD22.5 trillion—constrain the ability of most emerging Asian countries to fully realize the benefits of infrastructure development. For instance, over 70% of infrastructure investments in Asia are still funded by public resources, which pose acute financing challenges for many countries with limited budgets and fiscal constraints. This paper discusses some of the challenges associated with public financing of infrastructure projects in emerging Asian countries, before introducing some new options for alleviating their infrastructure investment needs. In particular, it proposes a new approach to infrastructure financing by utilizing the spillover effects of infrastructure investment, where additional revenues generated from such investment can be channeled back to investors as subsidy to increase the returns to their investment. The paper also argues the need for Asian countries to implement fiscal reforms and to develop a more balanced approach to financing, one that involves both the private and public sector.

Innovative financing of public infrastructure in Zimbabwe: Status vs. potential

“…The concept of innovative finance entails a mixture of specifically designed instruments and practices for augmenting conventional approach- It is essential to take advantage of the latent potential of using innovative financing approaches to catalyze more private capital towards investing in public infrastructure (Rillo & Ali, 2018). Notable innovative public infrastructure financing approaches entail public private partnerships (PPPs), credit enhancement tools, and novel special bond instruments amongst others (Mostafavi et al, 2021).…”

Financing infrastructure using floating-interest-rate infrastructure bond

“…Innovative methods for attracting private investment in infrastructure, such public-private partnership (PPP), have been advocated in the literature for many years (Rillo and Ali, 2018;Rowley, 2020). However, one of the main difficulties that PPPs face is the scarcity of bankable projects due to the low rate of return from infrastructure projects that mainly depend on user charges.…”

Redefining Strategic Routes to Financial Resilience in ASEAN+3

“…Although innovative methods for attracting private investment in infrastructure have been advocated in the literature for many years (Rillo andZulfiqar 2018, Rowley 2020), one of the main difficulties that PPPs face is the scarcity of bankable projects due to the low rate of return from infrastructure projects that mainly depend on user charges. In some cases, the response has been for the pendulum to swing to the other extreme where the public sector is forced to agree to an inordinately high rate of return for the private investor because of lack of other options.…”