2018
DOI: 10.7249/rr2559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Initial Conceptual Framework to Assess Community Allostatic Load: Early Themes from Literature Review and Community Analyses on the Role of Cumulative Community Stress

Abstract: Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, prior research indicates that observed stress among others can increase one's own stress [42], an observation that aligns with community development theorists' suggestion that community conditions impact well-being across concentric individual, social, and ecological levels [43]. The com-pounding of societal stressors is thought to occur at both the individual and community levels [44], which could contribute to disparate vulnerabilities to tobacco use in pursuit of stress relief. Economic hardship, mentioned by several participants in our study, may represent a stressor faced disproportionately by the communities of Black young adults given their higher rates of poverty and lower median incomes compared to other racial and age groups [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Notably, prior research indicates that observed stress among others can increase one's own stress [42], an observation that aligns with community development theorists' suggestion that community conditions impact well-being across concentric individual, social, and ecological levels [43]. The com-pounding of societal stressors is thought to occur at both the individual and community levels [44], which could contribute to disparate vulnerabilities to tobacco use in pursuit of stress relief. Economic hardship, mentioned by several participants in our study, may represent a stressor faced disproportionately by the communities of Black young adults given their higher rates of poverty and lower median incomes compared to other racial and age groups [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…natural disasters (Kaniasty, 2020;Sadeka et al, 2020) and other adverse life events (Chandra et al, 2018;Canavan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social infrastructure is the driver of social resilience; if weakened, it can threaten the ability of human conglomerations to function economically, socially and politically (Kulig et al, 2013;Vale, 2014;Chandra et al, 2018). Social cohesion, a construct that represents the solidarity among members of a community (Kawachi & Berkman, 2003;Friedkin, 2004;Kawachi & Subramanian, 2007;Buchan et al, 2008), is vital in building community resilience (Kulig et al, 2013;Chandra et al, 2018). Fostering social cohesion means creating societies where people are joined together by the presence of a strong social bond which is characterised by mutual trust, tolerance and reciprocity (Klein, 2013;Vale, 2014;Erdem et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, these impacts can have a cascade of knock-on effects. One is breakdowns in family and community institutions, as families, friends and neighbors turn on each other, grow distant, or in other ways turn inwards in attempts to survive (Chandra et al, 2018). Another is impoverishment for households and communities unable to access resources or exposed to risk-creating processes.…”
Section: Fema and Disaster Risk Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%