Making Open Development Inclusive 2020
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11635.003.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Inclusive, Open, and Collaborative Science: Lessons from OCSDNet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, despite their clear goals for greater democratization of knowledge, open systems have the potential to replicate the very values the movement has sought to challenge [26]. If we are to address the risk of further widening the power imbalances, then efforts to promote openness must be grounded in their historical and socio-political contexts [33,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, despite their clear goals for greater democratization of knowledge, open systems have the potential to replicate the very values the movement has sought to challenge [26]. If we are to address the risk of further widening the power imbalances, then efforts to promote openness must be grounded in their historical and socio-political contexts [33,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the legacies of colonialism continue to shape debates and practices around open scholarship [29,30]. To address these inequities, open scholarship needs to be understood in relation to the histories, socio-cultural contexts, and political powers that have shaped and continue to constrain the philosophical and ethical impulses of openness [26,[31][32][33][34].…”
Section: The Historical Political and Socio-economic Roots Of Open Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, current conceptions of open scholarship developed in the Global North fail (not surprisingly perhaps) to challenge the dominance of English language publishing or seek to open up to alternative epistemologies (Hillyer et al, 2017). However, within the epistemic injustices perspective a different model of open scholarship does have some resonance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, accounts of open science suggest the need to refer to a significantly wider range of open practices. Grigorov et al (2016) (Chan et al, 2015;Hillyer et al, 2017). These arguments suggest that through strengthening the research environment, the local research community would be better able to leverage knowledge to address local problems (e.g.…”
Section: Open Science/open Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%