Toward an Improved Understanding of Agile Project Governance

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide understanding of project governance practices in agile projects. A systematic review of the previous agile literature is conducted to identify and categorize agile project governance practices, which are synthesized in a six-dimensional framework. The study contributes to the literature by contrasting traditional and agile project governance practices and by identifying new practices emerging in agile projects, while also noting remaining gaps in knowledge. The implications of this study enable managers to identify and apply feasible governance practices that can support better agile project performance.

How Does Governance Influence Decision Making on Projects and in Project-Based Organizations?

“…In investigating how governance can improve decision-making in groups, we looked at three issues. Lappi et al (2018) show how governance can improve the inputs and processes of a team working framework, (Reader et al, 2009). Similarly, Müller et al (2015) invoke institutional theory to show that governance can improve team working.…”

“…On the other hand, Müller et al (2016b) say that the governance of the temporary organization should allow flexibility to cope with risk and the uniqueness of the project. Lappi et al (2018) say flexibility is important for agile projects and aids the connection of the projects to corporate strategy. Riis et al (2019) show how organizations get value from multiple small projects by establishing and maturing links between the levels.…”

“…None of the papers on governance surveyed made any direct suggestions about how the governance of project management can reduce group biases within project teams. Some stressed the importance of ensuring a strong link of between project governance, the governance of projects and board level governance, (see for instance Lappi et al, 2018;Müller et al, 2014aMüller et al, , 2016aMüller et al, , 2017Too & Weaver, 2014). Müller et al (2014a) describe abilities as enablers for project governance some of which will influence the way people work in groups, including communication mechanisms which may help to reduce biases; awareness of organizational goals and needs; open discussion.…”

“…The main issue with respect to identify discussed in the papers on governance reviewed is in defining people's roles, responsibilities and authorities on projects, that is defining their roles and relationships with others, (see for instance, DeFilippi & Sydow, 2016;Lappi et al, 2018;McGrath & Whitty, 2015;Müller et al, 2014b;Steen et al, 2018). This is associated with the OECD's principle of accountability, Müller (2017).…”

Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Project Governance: A Scientometric Review

“…Too and Weaver [19] examined existing project governance research and proposed that good project governance should achieve optimal balance between portfolio management, project sponsorship, project management and office and program support and improve project performance. Lappi et al [20] reported a six-dimensional framework of project governance in agile projects. Derakhshan et al [21] developed a project governance model adopting a stakeholder approach.…”