2020
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.303002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection

Abstract: The question of the relative evolutionary roles of adaptive and nonadaptive processes has been a central debate in population genetics for nearly a century. While advances have been made in the theoretical development of the underlying models, and statistical methods for estimating their parameters from large-scale genomic data, a framework for an appropriate null model remains elusive. A model incorporating evolutionary processes known to be in constant operation, genetic drift (as modulated by the demographi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
222
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
6
222
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2018). Recently, Johri et al . (2020) proposed using approximate Bayesian computation for joint inference of demography and purifying selection, which could lead to more appropriate null models for the detection of loci involved in adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018). Recently, Johri et al . (2020) proposed using approximate Bayesian computation for joint inference of demography and purifying selection, which could lead to more appropriate null models for the detection of loci involved in adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priors on ancestral and current population sizes were drawn from a uniform distribution between 10 5 -10 7 diploid individuals, while the time of change was fixed at 10 6 608 (~Ne) generations. In order to simulate functional regions, 94 single-exon genes, as described in Johri et al (2020) and provided in https://github.com/paruljohri/BGS_Demography_DFE/blob/master/DPGP3_data.zip, were simulated with recombination rates specific to those exons (https://petrov.stanford.edu/cgibin/recombination-rates_updateR5.pl) (Fiston-Lavier et al 2010;Comeron et al 2012). Mutation rates were assumed to be fixed at 3 × 10 -9 per site per generation (Keightley et al 2009;Keightley et al 2014).…”
Section: Performing Inference By Approximate Bayesian Computation (Abc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we can also explore the joint effects of recurrent sweeps and recent population size changes. These are not well understood, and are important for estimating the relative importance of background selection and recurrent sweeps in shaping genome-wide patterns of variability (e.g., Johri et al 2020).…”
Section: Applying Phase-type Theory To Other Population Genetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%