2012
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1452-12.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Efficient and Integrative Analysis of Limited-Choice Behavioral Experiments: Figure 1.

Abstract: Editor's Note: Toolboxes are intended to describe and evaluate methods that are becoming widely relevant to the neuroscience community or to provide a critical analysis of established techniques. For more information, see http://www.jneurosci.org/misc/ifa_minireviews.dtl.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e) The mean inter-pulse interval, here shown for the lower component of a Gaussian mixture model, showed considerable variation amongst strains. (f) The relative amounts of sine and pulse trains were treated as a "three-way choice' - between sine train, pulse train, and no song - and plotted as recommended by Schilling et al [45]. This method reveals that flies that produced more song overall sang proportionately fewer sine trains relative to pulse trains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e) The mean inter-pulse interval, here shown for the lower component of a Gaussian mixture model, showed considerable variation amongst strains. (f) The relative amounts of sine and pulse trains were treated as a "three-way choice' - between sine train, pulse train, and no song - and plotted as recommended by Schilling et al [45]. This method reveals that flies that produced more song overall sang proportionately fewer sine trains relative to pulse trains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accepted way to analyze compositional data is to work with ratios between the observed values instead of the raw values themselves [ 28 ]. Thus, our primary outcome of interest in all inferential models was a preference ratio, calculated as the time spent by each rat in the N 2 O chamber divided by the time it spent in the control chamber in the same dyad.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because zero values are problematic when taking log-ratios, we added 5 sec to all zero values, which equaled one-half the lower limit of detection (i.e., 10 sec). As discussed extensively by Schilling and colleagues [ 28 ], this assumes that zero values for side chambers do not indicate that a rat would have continued exclusively occupying the central chamber (known as a structural zero). We felt that this assumption was reasonable because the experimental design during the first four dyads encouraged rats to eventually enter side chambers to access water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were log transformed to account for heteroscedasticity. When ratio values such as the brain/plasma ratio were compared, these were log transformed before analysis to account for the constrained structure of ratio variables (e.g., Heslop, 2009;Schilling et al, 2012). The dependence of jumping behavior on 6b-naltrexol levels was modeled using a four-parametric log-normal curve taking into account that the response was a count variable.…”
Section: An Opioid Antagonist-based Preventive Therapy For Nasmentioning
confidence: 99%