2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2212703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Axiomatic Definition of Conflict Between Belief Functions

Abstract: Recently, the problem of measuring the conflict between two bodies of evidence represented by belief functions has known a regain of interest. In most works related to this issue, Dempster's rule plays a central role. In this paper, we propose to study the notion of conflict from a different perspective. We start by examining consistency and conflict on sets and extract from this settings basic properties that measures of consistency and conflict should have. We then extend this basic scheme to belief function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this line, I participated to Destercke's work to define an adapted measure of conflict in an axiomatic way. As a result, we established in [18], that for an imprecise statistics view, Dempster's conflict was indeed the good way to estimate conflict, while for a singular view, a simple plausibility based definition was perfectly sensible. More precisely, in the case of independent sources, we proposed the following measure of conflict, based on the products of contour functions:…”
Section: Conflict Measurementmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following this line, I participated to Destercke's work to define an adapted measure of conflict in an axiomatic way. As a result, we established in [18], that for an imprecise statistics view, Dempster's conflict was indeed the good way to estimate conflict, while for a singular view, a simple plausibility based definition was perfectly sensible. More precisely, in the case of independent sources, we proposed the following measure of conflict, based on the products of contour functions:…”
Section: Conflict Measurementmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Third, it is proven that all the properties of semi-pseudo-metrics are desirable. Fourth, the outer plausibility conflict from [18] is demonstrated to be a semi-pseudo-metric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The idea behind refinement is that one may be interested in reasoning at different scales, starting with a coarse one and then transferring our beliefs on a finer one using mapping r. As shows the next example, the operators introduced in this article are not immune to such an operation, for the main reason that distances are in general not invariant with respect to refinements (for a discussion about this, see [8]). Although informative partial orders are preserved after refinement, the sets of more informative functions S f (m i ) are different.…”
Section: Properties Of New Conjunctive Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduced the correction corresponding to a possible loss of the person's synchronization with the day versus night synchronizers to avoid false alarms. The problem of measuring the conflict between two bodies of evidence is been represented by belief functions in [10]. The system proposes to study the notion of conflict from different aspect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%