2013
DOI: 10.1111/jhis.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Anthropometric History of Chosŏn Dynasty Korea, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in the Appendix (Figures 1 to 3), there is height heaping around 8.0 ch'ŏk. The reason for this may be that, since 8.0 was the standard, expected height of pre-modern Korean men (Lewis et al, 2013), conscripts appearing to have such a standard height were probably not measured and estimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in the Appendix (Figures 1 to 3), there is height heaping around 8.0 ch'ŏk. The reason for this may be that, since 8.0 was the standard, expected height of pre-modern Korean men (Lewis et al, 2013), conscripts appearing to have such a standard height were probably not measured and estimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lengths of measuring sticks were regulated by the king by sending 'master' measuring sticks to every frontier pass, county office, garrison, and post station, local people continued to use their own 'modified' measuring sticks as these sticks were used for trade (i.e., to commit commercial fraud). Lewis et al (2013) conducted a meta analysis of extant 'master' measuring sticks to proxy the conversion rate of pre-modern Korean ch'ŏk into modern centimeters, but they assume that the surveyors either used an official one (usually made out of metal) or an unofficial one (usually made out of wood) that was a good copy of the 'master'. It cannot be ruled out that some surveyors might have applied a local measuring stick instead of a 'standard' one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations